[2021] KEBPRT 644 (KLR)

[2021] KEBPRT 644 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the tenant was properly served with the application but failed to respond or appear. Satisfied with the affidavit of service, the Tribunal held that the landlord was entitled to exercise the right of distress for rent arrears under the law. The Tribunal granted leave to the landlord to break...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEBPRT 644 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Ihururu Investments & Cooperative Society; Applicant: Charles Munga Kimita t/a Mwalimu Agencies Co. Ltd; Respondent: Joseph Maina
Court
Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 31 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
Outcome
application allowed
Legal Topics
Distress for Rent, Commercial Landlord Tenant, Rent Arrears, Eviction Procedure
Source Language
en
Land and Property Distress for Rent Commercial Landlord Tenant Rent Arrears Eviction Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ihururu Investments & Cooperative Society

Applicant

Charles Munga Kimita t/a Mwalimu Agencies Co. Ltd

Applicant

Joseph Maina

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the landlord is entitled to break into the premises and distrain for outstanding rent arrears.
  2. 2 Whether proper service was effected on the tenant and if the tenant was given an opportunity to respond.
  3. 3 Whether the landlord is entitled to costs of the proceedings.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the tenant was properly served with the application but failed to respond or appear. Satisfied with the affidavit of service, the Tribunal held that the landlord was entitled to exercise the right of distress for rent arrears under the law. The Tribunal granted leave to the landlord to break into the premises and distrain for the outstanding rent, subject to the involvement of a licensed auctioneer and oversight by the Tribunal. The Tribunal also ordered that an inventory be taken and an account rendered, ensuring procedural fairness and transparency. Costs were awarded to the landlord due to the tenant's default and failure to contest the application.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The landlord/applicant is allowed to break into the business premises and distrain for outstanding rent arrears using a licensed auctioneer.
  • An inventory of all distrained goods shall be taken by the auctioneer in the presence of the Tribunal Officer responsible for Nyeri and filed on the Tribunal.