[2016] KEHC 5881 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 5881 (KLR)

The court found that since the plaintiff's suit had been dismissed for want of prosecution and there was no pending application to reinstate it, the inhibition and restriction orders placed on the land during the pendency of the suit no longer served any legal purpose. The District Land Registrar required a court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 5881 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Ikamati M' Mutirithia; Defendant: Samson Kimanaa
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Meru
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Case 345 of 1989
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Post Dismissal Application for Removal of Inhibitions
Outcome
Application allowed.
Judges
FM Njoroge
Legal Topics
Removal of Inhibitions, Land Restrictions, Dismissal for Want of Prosecution
Source Language
en
Land and Property Removal of Inhibitions Land Restrictions Dismissal for Want of Prosecution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ikamati M' Mutirithia

Plaintiff

Samson Kimanaa

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Post Dismissal Application for Removal of Inhibitions

  1. 1 Whether the court should order removal of all inhibitions and restriction orders on land parcel NJIA/BURIERURI/1522 after dismissal of the suit for want of prosecution.
  2. 2 Whether there is any pending application to reinstate the dismissed suit that would bar the granting of the orders sought.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that since the plaintiff's suit had been dismissed for want of prosecution and there was no pending application to reinstate it, the inhibition and restriction orders placed on the land during the pendency of the suit no longer served any legal purpose. The District Land Registrar required a court order to remove these restrictions, and the defendant, being elderly, wished to distribute his land. The application was therefore allowed to implement the court's earlier decision and to further the interests of justice.

Court Disposition

Application allowed.

Orders

  • An order is issued for removal of all inhibition and restriction orders concerning land parcel No. NJIA/BURIERURI/1522.
  • Costs are awarded to the applicant.