https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/3381

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/keelc/2026/3381

The application failed because the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence that Rene & Hans Advocates LLP had been properly instructed, while the record already showed that P.G. Kaingu & Co. Advocates and Wanjiru Thungu & Co. Advocates had valid instructions and a prior representation dispute had already been...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEELC 3381 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Imbani Dispensary; Respondent: Abdulrahman Mohamed Abdi
Court
Environment and Land Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application 195 of 2019
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Leave to Come on Record
Outcome
Dismissed
Judges
["CG Mbogo"]
Legal Topics
Change of Advocates, Leave to Come on Record, Representation Dispute, Execution of Decree, Order 9 Rule 9 Civil Procedure Rules
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Advocacy Practice Land Law Change of Advocates Leave to Come on Record Representation Dispute Execution of Decree Order 9 Rule 9 Civil Procedure Rules

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Imbani Dispensary

Applicant

Abdulrahman Mohamed Abdi

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Leave to Come on Record

  1. 1 Whether the firm of Rene & Hans Advocates LLP had a lawful basis to come on record for the applicant alongside advocates already on record.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds to grant leave for the proposed change/joinder of advocates.
  3. 3 Whether the motion was frivolous or an abuse of the court process.

Ratio Decidendi

The application failed because the applicant did not provide sufficient evidence that Rene & Hans Advocates LLP had been properly instructed, while the record already showed that P.G. Kaingu & Co. Advocates and Wanjiru Thungu & Co. Advocates had valid instructions and a prior representation dispute had already been resolved. On that basis, the court held the motion was frivolous and dismissed it.

Court Disposition

Dismissed

Orders

  • The notice of motion dated 12th November, 2025 is dismissed.
  • No order as to costs.