[2022] KEELC 15236 (KLR)
The court found that the inhibition registered against land parcel Isukha/Mukulusu/1107 was based on an injunctive order granted to the plaintiff pending determination of the suit. Since the suit was dismissed and judgment delivered on November 5, 2019, the injunctive order became spent as of that date. There was no...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEELC 15236 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Nicholas Chimoma Imbukwa; Defendant: Beatrice Mboga Magalasia
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Kakamega
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 99 of 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion / Post Judgment Application for Removal of Inhibition
- Outcome
- Application allowed; inhibition to be lifted; no order as to costs.
- Judges
- DO Ohungo
- Legal Topics
- Removal of Inhibition, Injunctive Orders, Land Registration, Succession Proceedings
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nicholas Chimoma Imbukwa
Plaintiff
Beatrice Mboga Magalasia
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Post Judgment Application for Removal of Inhibition
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the inhibition registered against land parcel Isukha/Mukulusu/1107 pursuant to a court order should be lifted following dismissal of the plaintiff's suit.
- 2 Whether there is any valid reason for the inhibition to remain on the register after judgment.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the inhibition registered against land parcel Isukha/Mukulusu/1107 was based on an injunctive order granted to the plaintiff pending determination of the suit. Since the suit was dismissed and judgment delivered on November 5, 2019, the injunctive order became spent as of that date. There was no stay of judgment or any other valid reason for the inhibition to remain on the register. The continued existence of the inhibition was unjustified and was hindering the defendant from completing succession proceedings. Accordingly, the court held that the inhibition should be lifted and/or removed.
Court Disposition
Application allowed; inhibition to be lifted; no order as to costs.
Orders
- The inhibition registered against land parcel number Isukha/Mukulusu/1107 on September 27, 2017 pursuant to an order issued by the court on September 26, 2017 be lifted and/or removed.
- No order on costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
Imbukwa v Magalasia (Environment & Land Case 99 of 2017) [2022] KEELC 15236 (KLR) (7 December 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEELC 15236 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Environment and Land Court at Kakamega
Environment & Land Case 99 of 2017
DO Ohungo, J
December 7, 2022
Between
Nicholas Chimoma Imbukwa
Plaintiff
and
Beatrice Mboga Magalasia
Defendant
Ruling
1. Judgment was delivered in this matter on November 5, 2019, by my sister N A Matheka, J. The plaintiff’s suit was dismissed with no order on costs. There followed no activity in the matter until November 2, 2022, when the defendant filed notice of motion dated November 2, 2022, seeking the following orders:1. That the inhibition registered on land parcel No. Isukha/Mukulusu/1107 by the plaintiff through a court order issued on September 26, 2017 and registered at the Lands registry on September 27, 2017 be lifted and/or removed.2. That costs be provided.
2. The application is supported by an affidavit sworn by the defendant. She deposed that during the pendency of this suit, the plaintiff made an application dated March 15, 2017 seeking injunctive orders and that through a ruling delivered on September 26, 2017, the plaintiff was granted an injunction which order was registered at the land registry on September 27, 2017. She added that she is in the process of completing the succession proceedings in respect of the estate of her deceased husband who was the registered proprietor of parcel number Isukha/Mukulusu/1107 and that the inhibition registered pursuant to the said order is hindering her from completing the succession process. She annexed a copy of a certificate of official search in respect of the property as on November 3, 2022 and further stated that the judgment has not been stayed.
3. Although an affidavit of service of the application upon the plaintiff was filed, the plaintiff did not file any response. The application is thus unopposed. The applicant urged the court to grant the orders sought.
4. I have considered the application and the material on record. The record indeed confirms that through a ruling delivered on September 26, 2017, the plaintiff was granted an injunction restraining the defendant from among others, interfering with or alienating land parcel number Isukha/Mukulusu/1107, pending hearing and determination of the suit. As is confirmed from the certificate of official search which has been annexed, the order was registered as an encumbrance against the property on September 27, 2017. The suit having been determined through the judgment delivered on November 5, 2019, the said injunctive order stood spent as at the date of judgment. There is thus no valid reason why the encumbrance registered on September 27, 2017 pursuant to the order of September 26, 2017 should remain on the register.
5. In view of the foregoing, I find merit in notice of motion dated November 2, 2022. I therefore make the following orders:a.The inhibition registered against land parcel number Isukha/Mukulusu/1107 on September 27, 2017 pursuant to an order issued by the court on September 26, 2017 be lifted and/or removed.b.No order on costs.
DATED, SIGNED, AND DELIVERED AT KAKAMEGA THIS 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2022. D O OHUNGOJUDGEDelivered in open court in the presence of:No appearance for the plaintiffNo appearance for the defendantCourt Assistant: E Juma