[2021] KEHC 1381 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 1381 (KLR)

The court found that the Applicants, being within the eligible age bracket and having fulfilled all statutory and social requirements, were suitable to adopt the minor. The minor, aged 17, consented to the adoption, and the biological father’s consent was dispensed with due to his absence and inability to be traced....

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 1381 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: WWO; Applicant: SWM; AAPW (minor)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Adoption Cause E041 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Outcome
adoption granted
Legal Topics
Adoption Procedure, Kinship Adoption, Child Best Interests, Consent of Minor
Source Language
en
Family and Children Adoption Procedure Kinship Adoption Child Best Interests Consent of Minor

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

WWO

Applicant

SWM

Applicant

AAPW (minor)

Procedural Posture

Adoption Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Applicants meet the legal and social requirements for adoption under the Children’s Act.
  2. 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the minor as required by the Constitution and statute.
  3. 3 Whether the consent of the biological father is necessary or can be dispensed with.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Applicants, being within the eligible age bracket and having fulfilled all statutory and social requirements, were suitable to adopt the minor. The minor, aged 17, consented to the adoption, and the biological father’s consent was dispensed with due to his absence and inability to be traced. The reports from the adoption society, guardian ad litem, and Director of Children Services all supported the adoption, confirming that it would serve the best interests of the child. The court emphasized the constitutional and statutory mandate to prioritize the child’s best interests, noting that the adoption would provide the minor with a stable, loving family environment...

Court Disposition

adoption granted

Orders

  • The Applicants WWO and SWM are allowed to adopt AAPW, who shall henceforth be known as APZO.
  • The child’s date of birth is confirmed as 28th April 2004 and place of birth as Nairobi, Kenya.