[2025] KEHC 814 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under Kenyan law, including providing evidence of their marriage, financial stability, good health, and absence of criminal records. The child, being the biological daughter of the female applicant and having bonded with the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 814 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: MMA; Applicant: KDOO
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause E183 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Adoption granted.
- Judges
- SN Riechi
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Procedure, Kinship Adoption, Best Interests of Child
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MMA
Applicant
KDOO
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the statutory requirements for adoption under Kenyan law have been satisfied.
- 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child as required by Article 53(2) of the Constitution and Section 8 of the Children Act, 2022.
- 3 Whether the consent of the biological father is necessary or can be dispensed with.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under Kenyan law, including providing evidence of their marriage, financial stability, good health, and absence of criminal records. The child, being the biological daughter of the female applicant and having bonded with the male applicant, was found to be in a stable and loving environment. The reports from the adoption agency, guardian ad litem, and Children Services all recommended the adoption, confirming the applicants' suitability. The court determined that the best interests of the child would be served by allowing the adoption, especially given the absence of the biological father and the...
Court Disposition
Adoption granted.
Orders
- The 2nd Applicant KDOO is allowed to adopt AAN, who shall henceforth be known as AANO.
- MO and PAO are appointed legal guardians of the child.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
In re Adoption of AAN (Adoption Cause E183 of 2024) [2025] KEHC 814 (KLR) (23 January 2025) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 814 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Adoption Cause E183 of 2024
SN Riechi, J
January 23, 2025
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR THE ADOPTION OF AAN
In the matter of
MMA
1st Applicant
KDOO
2nd Applicant
Judgment
1. The Applicants, MMA and KDOO are in a monogamous marriage which was solemnized on 10th June 2013 at St. Mark’s Church Westlands within Nairobi County as evidenced by a copy as evidenced by a copy of their marriage certificate serial number 142XXXX attached to the application.
2. KDOO, male applicant is a Kenyan Citizen aged 41 years old born on 23rd March 1983 as evidenced by a copy of his National Identification Card number 2311XXXX attached to the summons. MMA, female applicant is a Kenyan Citizen aged 39 years old born on 5th November 1985 as evidenced by a copy of her national identification card number 24087XXXX attached to the application.
3. The applicants have been blessed with three biological children and one biological daughter of the female applicant. The applicants biological children are namely; JHJ born 3rd March 2016,Julian Tendai Jabuya born on 17th July 2017 and JNAO born on 15th November 2019 as evidenced by copies of their birth certificates attached to the application.
4. KDOO, male applicant now wishes to adopt a female child known as baby AAN who is 15 years old and biological daughter of female applicant. The evidence on record indicates that the child was born to MMA female Applicant herein and one AML on 7th October 2008 at [Particulars Withheld] Hospital in Uganda. The female applicant broke up with the biological father of the child and the female applicant has been the sole provider of the child until she met the male applicant herein.
5. From the pleadings, this court finds that the 1st applicant is a business lady and the 2nd applicant is a Banker employed by [Particulars Withheld] Bank Kenya Limited. The applicants reside in Lavington within Nairobi County. They both profess Christian Faith.
6. Prior to the hearing of the adoption application, Buckner Kenya Adoption Services prepared and filed a report dated 12th August 2024 . They also issued a Certificate serial number 07XXXX declaring the child free for adoption as evidenced by the copies of report and certificate declaring a child free for Adoption attached to the application.
7. The applicants stated that they have no previous criminal record and no pending criminal prosecution as evidenced by their respective police clearance certificates attached to the application.
8. The applicants are both physically and emotionally fit and healthy to parent, love and care for the child as evidenced by copies of their Medical reports attached to the application.
9. The applicants are financially stable and they are therefore able to provide fully for the child’s need as evidenced by copies of their financial documents attached to the application.
10. The guardian ad litem Ms.AK filed a report dated 21. 11. 2024 which was favourable and recommended the adoption of the child by the Applicants.
11. Ms. Winfred Ikinya , Assistant Director Children Services Children conducted home visits and established that the applicants are financially and emotionally capable of providing for the upkeep and education of the child and filed a report dated 22nd November 2024 recommending the adoption for reasons that the child stands to gain from the opportunities provided by becoming the daughter of the male Applicant and that the 2nd Applicant has fulfilled the statutory requirements.
12. The legal guardians Mr.MO and Ms. PA consented to be appointed as legal guardians of the child and they filed their respective letter of consent attached to the application.The consent of the biological father was dispensed with since his whereabouts is unknown.
13. This is a kinship adoption and from the record the Applicants have fulfilled all the legal requirements relating to the adoption of the child. The child was in court during the virtual hearing and appeared to have bonded well with the Applicants.
14. I have examined the evidence herein and best interest of the child as required in Article 53 (2) of the Constitution and Section 8 the Children’s Act,2022. I find that it is in the best interest of the child to be adopted by the male Applicant. I therefore allow the prayers sought in the originating Summons dated 4th September 2024 and Order as follows:i.The 2nd Applicant KDOO is hereby allowed to adopt AAN who shall henceforth be known as AANO.ii.MO and PAO are hereby appointed the legal guardians of the child.iii.The Registrar General is directed to enter this Order in the Adopted Children Registry.iv.The guardian ad litem is hereby discharged.
DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 23RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2025. ..........................S. N. RIECHIJUDGE