[2011] KEHC 1355 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had fulfilled all statutory requirements for international adoption under the Children’s Act, 2001, including obtaining approvals from relevant authorities in both Kenya and Finland. The child, having been abandoned at birth and unclaimed, was declared free for adoption. The court...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] KEHC 1355 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: J. M.M; Applicant: V.S.H
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 34 of 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- adoption granted
- Judges
- I Lenaola
- Legal Topics
- International Adoption, Child Abandonment, Best Interests of Child
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
J. M.M
Applicant
V.S.H
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Adoption Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants meet the legal requirements for international adoption under the Children Act, 2001.
- 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child.
- 3 Whether all procedural and statutory approvals for adoption have been obtained.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had fulfilled all statutory requirements for international adoption under the Children’s Act, 2001, including obtaining approvals from relevant authorities in both Kenya and Finland. The child, having been abandoned at birth and unclaimed, was declared free for adoption. The court determined that the adoption would serve the best interests of the child, as required by law, and that the applicants were fit and proper persons to assume parental responsibility. Accordingly, the court exercised its discretion to grant the adoption order, authorizing the applicants to adopt the child and directing the Registrar General to enter the order in the Adoption...
Court Disposition
adoption granted
Orders
- J.M.M and V.S.H are authorized to adopt Baby F.B, who shall henceforth be known as F.O – V. B. M.
- The Registrar General is directed to enter this order in the Adoption Register.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN ACT, 2001
AND
IN THE MATTER OF BABY F.B – MINOR
J. M.M........................................................................................................1ST APPLICANT
V.S.H.........................................................................................................2ND APPLICANT
J U D G M E N T
1. The Applicants hereinabove, seek orders under Sections 154, 156(1), 157(1), 158(1)(2)(d) and 4(a), 159(4), (6), (7) and 8(a), 160(1), (2) and (4), 162, 163, 164(1) and 170 of the Children’s Act, No.8 of 2001 as well as Section 24 of the Interpretation and General Provisions Act, Cap.2, Laws of Kenya and in the Originating Summons dated 1st June 2011, they specifically sought orders that one, C.W.O, be appointed guardian ad litem and that the Director – Children’s Department Ministry of Gender, Children and Social Development do investigate the applicant’s fitness to adopt the child Baby F.B (hereinafter “the child”) before any adoption order can be made.
2. I note that a guardian ad litem was appointed on 11th March 2011 by Kimaru J. and the report by the Director of the Children’s Department in the Ministry of Gender, Children and Social Development was filed on 12th May 2011 and therefore the only issue left to be determined is whether the Applicants should be granted orders to adopt the child, subject of these proceedings.
3. I have taken into account the following documents:
(i)An Affidavit sworn on 1st March 2011 by the 1st Applicant.
(ii)A Statement of Facts dated 1st March 2011 by the Applicants, jointly.
4. In summary, the contents of both documents are that the Applicants were born in Finland on 12th June 1974 and 3rd June 1974 respectively. Further that they have a four (4) year old biological daughter, V.
5. That the child was born or about 3rd October 2009 at Vihiga District Hospital and was thereafter abandoned by the mother. The matter was reported at Mbale Police Station on 22nd September 2009 and on 9th October 2009, the child was admitted to New Life Home in Kisumu. No one has claimed him since that day.
6. Apart from the two documents cited above, I have also read a Home Report for Inter-Country Adoption dated 31st October 2010 and in the Report, the Applicants are said to be fit adoptive parents. The Kenya National Adoption Committee has also approved their application for adoption of a Kenyan child by letter dated 15th September 2010, and the Director, Little Angels network was informed of that fact.
7. The Ministry of Social Affairs and Health of Finland has granted permission to the Applicants to adopt the child by a Decision dated 26th May 2011.
8. The Director of Children’s Services in the Ministry of Gender, Children and Social Development by a report dated 11th May 2011 has also recommended that the Applicants are fit and proper persons to adopt the child.
9. Apart from all the above, Little Angels Network by a report dated 16th June 2011 has declared that the child is free for adoption pursuant to Section 156(1) of the Children’s Act.
10. With the above information before me, I also find that in the presentcase, the Applicants have met the following conditions;
(i)They have received the relevant approvals from the relevant authorities in Finland and in Kenya.
(ii)The child in this case is under the age of eighteen (18) years as she was born on or around 3rd October 2009.
(iii)The child’s best interests would be served if the Applicants take care and custody of him as his parents abandoned him at birth and although his biological mother, P.M gave birth to him at Vihiga District Hospital, she cannot be traced.
11. With that background, I should only restate the law as regards the issue at hand before granting the orders sought. Section 162 of the Children’s Act clothes the court with discretion to make an international adoption order if it is satisfied that the conditions set out therein have been met and I have said the Applicants herein have done so.
12. In conclusion, I will order as follows;
(i)J.M.M and V.S.H are authorized by this court to adopt Baby F. B and the child shall henceforth be known as F.O – V. B. M.
(ii)The Registrar General is hereby directed to enter this order in the Adoption Register.
(iii)The guardian ad Litem is hereby discharged of any responsibilities over the child.
(iv)I shall make no order as to costs.
13. Orders accordingly.
DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI THIS 20TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2011
I.LENAOLA
JUDGE