[2012] KEHC 5382 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act. The child was abandoned and reasonable efforts to trace the parents or guardians were unsuccessful, justifying dispensation with parental consent. The applicants were assessed as suitable by both the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] KEHC 5382 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: D.M.K.; Applicant: A.K.M.
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 44 of 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Application / Ruling on Originating Summons for Adoption Order
- Outcome
- adoption order granted
- Judges
- DW Mbuteti
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Procedure, Child Welfare, Abandoned Children
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
D.M.K.
Applicant
A.K.M.
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Adoption Application / Ruling on Originating Summons for Adoption Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants meet the legal requirements for adoption under the Children Act.
- 2 Whether the consents of the child's biological parents or guardians can be dispensed with due to abandonment.
- 3 Whether the adoption is in the best interests and welfare of the child.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act. The child was abandoned and reasonable efforts to trace the parents or guardians were unsuccessful, justifying dispensation with parental consent. The applicants were assessed as suitable by both the adoption society and the District Children’s Officer, and the guardian ad litem supported the application. The court was satisfied that the adoption would serve the best interests and welfare of the child, and that no improper payments or rewards were involved. Accordingly, the adoption order was granted, and the Registrar-General was directed to make the necessary entry in the...
Court Disposition
adoption order granted
Orders
- The applicants are granted an adoption order in respect of the child, J.M.M.
- The child’s date of birth is declared as 1st October 2006, and place of birth as Kenya.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
IN THE MATTER OF BABY J. M.
1. D.M.K.
2. A.K.M.........................................APPLICANTS
R U L I N G
1. This is an application (by originating summons dated 23rd February 2010) for an adoption order. I have read all the affidavits and other materials filed in support of the summons.
2. The Applicants and the Child have been assessed and evaluated by a registered adoption society of Kenya. I have read the report of the adoption society, Kenya Children’s Home Adoption Society, dated 24th May 2010. I have also read an undated report filed on 21st January 2011 by the District Children’s Officer, Kitui. Both reports are favourable to the adoption order sought.
THE CHILD
3. The Child, J.M. (aka J. M. M.) is male and was born on 1st October 2006. He was found abandoned at Nyamakima in Nairobi on 2nd October 2006 by a Good Samaritan. He was taken to Central Police Station. The Child was then admitted to Cottolengo Centre for care and protection on 21st March 2007, and thereafter to Thomas Barnados Home on 8th November 2007.
By a court order granted on 29th February 2008 in Nairobi Children’s Court Protection and Care Case No. 9 of 2008, the Child was committed to the care and protection of the Thomas Barnados House.
4. On 14th May 2008 the Child was placed with the Applicants, and they have had him without interruption since then.
5. On 14th May 2008 the Child was declared free for adoption by the Kenya Christian Homes Adoption Society and a certificate to that effect issued on the same date.
GUARDIAN AD LITEM
6. On 2nd November 2010 F. M. M. was appointed by the court to be guardian ad litem of the Child.
THE APPLICANTS
7. The Applicants, D.M.K. and A.K.M.are husband and wife. They are both Kenyans and they reside at M[....] in Kitui District. Both are at least 21 years older than the Child. They are both of sound mind within the meaning of the Mental Health Act, Cap 242. The Applicants do not have any children of their own, but the wife had a child (now an adult) in a previous relationship. That child has given consent for the adoption.
8. The Applicants have never been convicted of a sexual or moral offence by a competent court of law. They are not homosexuals.
9. As already noted, the Child was abandoned. The Child’s parents are unknown and nobody has ever come forward to claim him, either as a relative or guardian. Bearing in mind that the interests of the Child are paramount, I hereby dispense with the consents required by section 158(4) of the Children’s Act, No 8 of 2001.
DECISION
10. I have considered all matters placed before the court, including the statements of the Applicants filed with the application. Being guided by the principle that the welfare of the Child is paramount, I am satisfied that the Applicants have the ability to properly maintain and educate the Child. I am also satisfied that no payment or other reward has been given to or by the Applicants as consideration for the adoption order sought.
11. I am further satisfied that after the Child was found abandoned, all reasonable steps were made, albeit unsuccessfully, to locate the parents or guardian of the Child. Nobody came forward, as relative or guardian, to claim the Child.
12. I am thus persuaded that all requirements of the law for the adoption order sought have been met. I am also persuaded that the Applicants will provide a good and conducive home in which the Child will grow into responsible adulthood.
13. In the event I will grant the adoption order sought. The Child’s name shall be J.M.M. His date of birth is 1st October 2006, and he was born in Kenya.
14. I hereby direct that the Registrar-General do make the necessary entry in the Adoption Children Register. This order shall be communicated to the Registrar-General in the prescribed form. Those will be the orders of the court.
15. The delay in preparation of this ruling is deeply regretted. It was caused by my poor state of health. But I thank God that I am much better now.
DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 7TH DAY OF AUGUST 2012
H.P.G. WAWERU
JUDGE
COUNTERSIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MACHAKOS THIS 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2012
ASIKE-MAKHANDIA
.............................
JUDGE