[2015] KEHC 5557 (KLR)
The court found that although the applicants had not been married for the statutory minimum of three years, the circumstances were exceptional because the 2nd applicant is the biological mother of the child and the adoption is a kinship adoption. The biological father had abandoned the child and played no role in...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 5557 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: T J D; Applicant: C A N
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 244 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- adoption granted
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Procedure, Kinship Adoption, Best Interests of Child
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
T J D
Applicant
C A N
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants, who have been married for less than three years, qualify to adopt the child under the special circumstances of kinship adoption.
- 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that although the applicants had not been married for the statutory minimum of three years, the circumstances were exceptional because the 2nd applicant is the biological mother of the child and the adoption is a kinship adoption. The biological father had abandoned the child and played no role in her life. The reports from the adoption agency, the Director of Children Services, and the guardian ad litem all supported the adoption, confirming that the applicants were suitable and that the adoption would serve the best interests of the child. The court was satisfied that the applicants had the financial and emotional capacity to care for the child, and that the adoption...
Court Disposition
adoption granted
Orders
- The applicants T J D and C A N are authorized to adopt Baby N O.
- The child shall henceforth be known as N O D.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
(FAMILY DIVISION)
ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 244 OF 2014
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR ADOPTION OF BABY N O
JUDGMENT
1. The Applicants T J D and C A N are seeking to be authorized to adopt Baby N O hereinafter referred to as the child. Baby N O is the biological child of the 2nd applicant, born to her and A M E on 17th November 2009. A M E abandoned the 2nd applicant while she was pregnant and has never been part of the child’s life and his whereabouts remain unknown .
2. The 1st applicant solemnized their marriage on the 15th of November 2013. They have one biological child A J D born on the 1st of March 2014. At the time of making the application for adoption the applicants had not been married for three years as required by the adoption regulations. The 2nd applicant has consented to the 1st applicant adopting baby N O.
3. On 25th September 2014 the baby N O was declared free for adoption by the Kenya Children’s Home and a certificate declaring the child free for adoption No. [particulars withheld] was issued. The report from the adoption agency was filed on the 6th November 2014. According to the said report the applicants want to adopt baby N and that they have met the necessary pre-requisites to adopt the child as prescribed in the Children’s Act 2001. The report recommends that the applicants are suitable to adopt and that they be allowed to adopt even though the applicants have not been married for 3 years.
4. The report from the Director of Children Services was filed on the 12th January 2015. Investigations revealed that though the parties have been married for less than 3 years there are special circumstances in that the 2nd applicant is the biological mother to the child and said adoption is a kinship adoption. When interviewed the reasons given for the adoption by the applicants were that the child is to given rights like any other children in the family, that the child be recognized as a bona fide member of the family and to give the child a father in her life. This report too recommends that the applicants be allowed to adopt the child. The guardian ad litem’s report too is favorable.
5. The applicants have not been married for 3 years. However I this is a case with special circumstance the applicants are married and wish to provide fully for the child the 2nd applicant is the child’s biological mother. The reasons advanced by the applicants are reasonable. Further its evident that the child’s father has never taken an interest in the child has not been seen or heard from. Lastly I note that this is a kinship adoption.
6. This court is satisfied that the applicants are qualified and able to take care of the child. The applicants have the financial and emotional capability to provide for the upkeep and education of the child. Baby N has been in the custody of the mother since birth and has bonded well with the 1st applicant. This court finds that it would be in the best interest of the child to be adopted by the applicants. I allow the application for adoption. The applicants T J D and C A Nare hereby allowed to adopt Baby N.The child shall be calledN O D. L S D and M Oshall be the legal guardians of the child should such any eventuality arise. I direct the Registrar General to enter this order in the adoption register. The child was born in Kenya and is therefore a Kenyan by birth and is entitled to the rights and benefits of a Kenyan Citizen. I hereby discharge the guardian ad litem. It is so ordered.
Dated signed and delivered this 27th day of February 2015
R. E .OUGO
JUDGE
In the presence of;
……………………………………………………….For the Applicants
……………………………………………………………….Court Clerk