[2024] KEHC 14167 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 14167 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants, being the biological parents of the child born through a lawful surrogacy arrangement, had fulfilled all statutory requirements for adoption under Kenyan law. The surrogate mother had voluntarily consented to the adoption and relinquished all parental rights, as evidenced by her...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 14167 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: GMM; Applicant: AAM; Guardian Ad Litem: EM Ondimu; Surrogate Mother: ENO; Legal Guardian: AMM
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Adoption Cause E1119 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Outcome
adoption granted
Judges
SN Riechi
Legal Topics
Adoption of Child, Surrogacy Arrangements, Parental Rights, Best Interests of Child
Source Language
en
Family and Children Adoption of Child Surrogacy Arrangements Parental Rights Best Interests of Child

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

GMM

Applicant

AAM

Applicant

EM Ondimu

Guardian Ad Litem

ENO

Surrogate Mother

AMM

Legal Guardian

Procedural Posture

Adoption Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have met the legal requirements for adoption under Kenyan law.
  2. 2 Whether the consent of the surrogate mother is valid and sufficient for the adoption.
  3. 3 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child as required by the Constitution and the Children Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants, being the biological parents of the child born through a lawful surrogacy arrangement, had fulfilled all statutory requirements for adoption under Kenyan law. The surrogate mother had voluntarily consented to the adoption and relinquished all parental rights, as evidenced by her written and oral testimony. Reports from the guardian ad litem, the Children Officer, and the adoption society confirmed the applicants' suitability, financial stability, and emotional capacity to care for the child. The court emphasized that the best interests of the child, as mandated by Article 53(2) of the Constitution and Section 8 of the Children Act, were served by...

Court Disposition

adoption granted

Orders

  • The applicants AAM and GMM are allowed to adopt SMM, who shall henceforth be known as SMM.
  • AMM is appointed the legal guardian of the child.