[2024] KEHC 15495 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 15495 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant has been the primary caregiver of the child since birth and that the child, having just completed secondary education, would benefit from continued parental responsibility to pursue tertiary education. The court held that special circumstances exist under section 35 of the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 15495 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: DKS; Respondent: CKS
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Adoption Cause E197 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
EKO Ogola
Legal Topics
Parental Responsibility Extension, Kinship Adoption, Child Welfare, Majority Age, Tertiary Education Support
Source Language
en
Family and Children Parental Responsibility Extension Kinship Adoption Child Welfare Majority Age Tertiary Education Support

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

DKS

Applicant

CKS

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Adoption Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the court should extend the applicant's parental responsibility for the child beyond the age of eighteen years.
  2. 2 Whether special circumstances exist to warrant the extension of parental responsibility under section 35 of the Children’s Act, 2022.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant has been the primary caregiver of the child since birth and that the child, having just completed secondary education, would benefit from continued parental responsibility to pursue tertiary education. The court held that special circumstances exist under section 35 of the Children’s Act, 2022, justifying the extension of parental responsibility beyond the age of eighteen. The extension is in the best interest of the child, ensuring her welfare is not prejudiced by the attainment of majority, particularly as she seeks to further her education abroad. The application was therefore allowed as prayed, extending the applicant’s parental responsibility until...

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The applicant’s parental responsibility for the child is extended until the child turns twenty-six years of age or completes her undergraduate degree, whichever comes sooner.