[2025] KEHC 6125 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 6125 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants, as the child’s maternal aunt and uncle by marriage, have provided a stable, loving, and supportive environment for the child since her mother’s death. The child’s father is absent and untraceable, and the extended family supports the adoption. Reports from the guardian ad litem...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 6125 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: AMS; Applicant: EWW
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Adoption Cause E114 of 2025
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Outcome
originating summons allowed; adoption granted
Judges
CJ Kendagor
Legal Topics
Kinship Adoption, Best Interests of Child, Parental Responsibility, Child Custody, Adoption Procedure
Source Language
en
Family and Children Kinship Adoption Best Interests of Child Parental Responsibility Child Custody Adoption Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

AMS

Applicant

EWW

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Adoption Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the applicants meet the legal requirements for kinship adoption under Kenyan law.
  2. 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child as required by the Constitution and the Children Act.
  3. 3 Whether due process, including consent and assessment by relevant authorities, has been followed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants, as the child’s maternal aunt and uncle by marriage, have provided a stable, loving, and supportive environment for the child since her mother’s death. The child’s father is absent and untraceable, and the extended family supports the adoption. Reports from the guardian ad litem and the Department of Children’s Services confirm the applicants’ suitability and the positive home environment. The child was declared free for adoption by a licensed agency. The court applied the principle that the best interests of the child are paramount, as enshrined in Article 53(2) of the Constitution and Section 8 of the Children’s Act. The applicants have demonstrated...

Court Disposition

originating summons allowed; adoption granted

Orders

  • AMS and EWW are authorized to adopt the child known as baby GNO.
  • The child shall hereinafter be known as GAW.