[2019] KEHC 11003 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 11003 (KLR)

The court determined that the application for adoption was premature due to several factors: the applicant is a foreigner and there is a moratorium on foreign adoptions; the biological parents of the minor are still married and have not divorced; and the relationship between the applicant and the child's mother is...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 11003 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: CMR
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Adoption Cause 137 of 2018
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Ruling on Originating Summons for Adoption and Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem
Outcome
Application held in abeyance; liberty to apply granted.
Judges
A Ali-Aroni
Legal Topics
Adoption Procedure, Foreign Adoption, Best Interests of Child, Consent Requirements
Source Language
en
Family and Children Adoption Procedure Foreign Adoption Best Interests of Child Consent Requirements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

CMR

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Adoption Cause / Ruling on Originating Summons for Adoption and Appointment of Guardian Ad Litem

  1. 1 Whether the adoption of the minor by the applicant, a foreigner, should be allowed under the current circumstances.
  2. 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child given the marital status of the biological parents and the relationship between the applicant and the child's mother.
  3. 3 Whether the moratorium on foreign adoptions affects the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court determined that the application for adoption was premature due to several factors: the applicant is a foreigner and there is a moratorium on foreign adoptions; the biological parents of the minor are still married and have not divorced; and the relationship between the applicant and the child's mother is not clearly defined. The court was not persuaded that the adoption at this stage would serve the best interests of the child. Consequently, the matter was held in abeyance to allow for the resolution of the parents' marital status and clarification of the relationship between the applicant and the child's mother. The applicant was granted liberty to move the court again should...

Court Disposition

Application held in abeyance; liberty to apply granted.

Orders

  • The matter is held in abeyance to allow for the parents' divorce and possible marriage between the minor's mother and the applicant.
  • The applicant is at liberty to move the court at an appropriate time when circumstances change.