[2011] KEHC 4120 (KLR)

[2011] KEHC 4120 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants had satisfied all statutory and procedural requirements for international adoption under Kenyan law. They were assessed and approved by both Swedish and Kenyan authorities, had custody of the child for the requisite period, and demonstrated the financial and emotional capacity to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2011] KEHC 4120 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: K.M.K; Applicant: M.E.A; Respondent: Attorney General (implied, for state/children's office)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Adoption Cause 132 of 2010
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Final Judgment
Outcome
adoption granted
Judges
LK Kimaru
Legal Topics
International Adoption, Child Welfare, Parental Rights, Adoption Procedure
Source Language
en
Family and Children International Adoption Child Welfare Parental Rights Adoption Procedure

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

K.M.K

Applicant

M.E.A

Applicant

Attorney General (implied, for state/children's office)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Adoption Cause / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the applicants meet the legal requirements for international adoption under Kenyan law.
  2. 2 Whether it is in the best interests of the child to grant the adoption order.
  3. 3 Whether the necessary consents and approvals have been obtained from relevant authorities.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had satisfied all statutory and procedural requirements for international adoption under Kenyan law. They were assessed and approved by both Swedish and Kenyan authorities, had custody of the child for the requisite period, and demonstrated the financial and emotional capacity to care for him. The child, abandoned at birth and declared free for adoption, had bonded with the applicants. All reports from relevant agencies and the guardian ad litem were favourable. The court held that granting the adoption was in the best interests of the child, and the applicants undertook to comply with post-adoption supervision and to accord the child all rights as...

Court Disposition

adoption granted

Orders

  • The applicants, K.M.K and M.E.A, are authorized to adopt baby M alias K alias B.K, who shall henceforth be known as K.N.B.K.
  • K.E.K and H.K.L.H are appointed as legal guardians of the child should misfortune befall the applicants.