[2011] KEHC 3646 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had fulfilled all statutory requirements for a local adoption under the Children Act, 2001. The child had been abandoned at birth, and all efforts to trace the biological parents had failed, justifying the dispensation of parental consent. The applicants demonstrated financial and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] KEHC 3646 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: A.M.M; Applicant: R.A.O.M
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 183 of 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- adoption granted
- Judges
- LK Kimaru
- Legal Topics
- Adoption of Children, Parental Rights, Best Interest of Child
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A.M.M
Applicant
R.A.O.M
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have met the legal requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001.
- 2 Whether it is in the best interest of the child to be adopted by the applicants.
- 3 Whether the consent of the biological parents can be dispensed with due to abandonment.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had fulfilled all statutory requirements for a local adoption under the Children Act, 2001. The child had been abandoned at birth, and all efforts to trace the biological parents had failed, justifying the dispensation of parental consent. The applicants demonstrated financial and emotional capacity to care for the child, and the child had bonded with them during the foster care period. Reports from the adoption society, the Director of Children’s Services, and the guardian ad litem all recommended the adoption. The court concluded that it was in the best interest of the child to be adopted by the applicants, who would assume all parental rights and...
Court Disposition
adoption granted
Orders
- The applicants, A.M.M and R.A.O.M, are allowed to adopt baby R.M.
- The child shall henceforth be known as M.O.M.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
17 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
ADOPTION CAUSE NO.183 OF 2009
IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN ACT, 2001
AND
IN THE MATTER OF BABY R.M (MINOR)
A.M.M………………………........……..……………………………………………….1ST APPLICANT
R.A.O.M………………………………….......………………………………………….2ND APPLICANT
J U D G M E N T
The applicants, A.M.M and R. A.O.M, are husband and wife. They were married under Kisii customary law in 1991 but later formalized their marriage under the African Christian Marriage and Divorce Act on 17th October 2010 in T District. The applicants have not been blessed with biological children of their own. They wish to adopt a child. Baby R.M (the child) was born on 16th August 2004 at Thika District Hospital. Soon after birth, the child was abandoned by his mother at the Antenatal ward in the said hospital. A report was made to Thika police station. The child was discharged from the hospital and take to Cottolengo Centre, Karen before he was later transferred to Thomas Barnado Home. The child was committed to the care and protection of the said children’s Home by the Thika children’s Court pending further court proceedings. Efforts by the concerned authorities, including the police, to trace the biological parents of the child have been in vain. This court therefore dispenses with the consent of biological parents of the child for the purpose of these adoption proceedings. The child was declared free for adoption on 13th August 2008 by Kenya Children’s Home Adoption Society. The child was placed under the care and custody of the applicants for compulsory foster care pending adoption on 27th July 2007.
The applicants were assessed by Kenya Children’s Home Adoption Society, the adoption society and by the Director of Children’s Services. The two organizations recommend the application by the applicants to adopt the child. S.O, the guardian ad litem, also prepared a report which is favourable and recommend the adoption. This is a local adoption. As stated earlier in this judgment, the applicants are married couple who have expressed their wish to adopt a male child. The applicants are Kenyan citizens by birth. They established that they have the financial and emotional capability and capacity to take care of the child. In the period of about four (4) years that the child has been in the custody of the applicants, it was evident to the court that the child has bonded with them.The child considers the applicants to be his parents. All the relevant agencies have recommended the adoption. This court is of the view that the applicants have fulfilled all the legal requirements for a local adoption.
This court formed the opinion that it would be in the best interest of the child for the child to be adopted by the applicants. The applicants will provide a home and a family for the child to grow up and be a useful member of the society. The applicants will be required to execute an undertaking that they shall assume all the parental rights and duties of the biological parents in respect of the adopted child; they shall treat the adopted child as if he was born to them in their marriage; they have been made aware that once the adoption order is issued, it shall be final and binding during the lifetime of the child that they shall adopt; that the child shall have the right to inherit their property; that an adoption order cannot be recanted, and further, that they shall not give up the child owing to any subsequent unforeseen behaviour or other changes in the child.
The court will therefore allow the applicants’ application to adopt the child. They have fulfilled the legal conditions for local adoptions by a married couple. The applicants, A.M.M and R.A.O.M, are hereby allowed to adopt baby R.M. Henceforth, the child shall be known as M.O.M. M.K shall be the legal guardian of the child should misfortune befall the applicants. The Registrar General is hereby directed to enter this adoption order in the Adoption Register. The guardian ad litem is hereby discharged. It is so ordered.
DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2011
L. KIMARU
JUDGE