[2022] KEELC 13453 (KLR)

[2022] KEELC 13453 (KLR)

The court found that while the law allows a minor to hold land through a trustee, the paramount consideration is the best interest of the child. The applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence that the loan would be used for the minors' benefit, and there was a risk that, in the event of default, the property...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELC 13453 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Sein Enole Murero; Respondent: Amos Leyian Murero; Respondent: Timothy Tupenet Murero (minor)
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Narok
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Miscellaneous Case E006 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Leave to Register a Charge Over Property Involving a Minor
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
CG Mbogo
Legal Topics
Registration of Charge, Interests of Minors, Trusteeship of Land, Consent to Charge Property
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Registration of Charge Interests of Minors Trusteeship of Land Consent to Charge Property

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sein Enole Murero

Applicant

Amos Leyian Murero

Respondent

Timothy Tupenet Murero (minor)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Leave to Register a Charge Over Property Involving a Minor

  1. 1 Whether the court should grant leave to register a charge over property jointly owned by an adult and a minor.
  2. 2 Whether it is in the best interest of the minor to allow the property to be used as security for a loan.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that while the law allows a minor to hold land through a trustee, the paramount consideration is the best interest of the child. The applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence that the loan would be used for the minors' benefit, and there was a risk that, in the event of default, the property could be sold, leaving the minors without property. The court determined that it would not be in the best interest of the minors to grant leave to charge the property, especially given the applicant's and her husband's lack of formal employment and the inconsistencies in the stated purpose of the loan. The court held that the property should remain undisturbed until the minors...

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The notice of motion application dated July 6, 2022 is dismissed.
  • No orders as to costs.