[2022] KEHC 1940 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 1940 (KLR)

The court found that there was no evidence that the applicant was being held by the police or any state agency at the time of the application. However, due to the lack of progress in police investigations, the applicant's loss of faith in the process, and the perception of bias given that implicated officers were...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 1940 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Samson Gebreigzi Teklemichael; Respondent: Republic of Kenya
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application 423 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Directions on Habeas Corpus Application
Outcome
Directions issued; judicial inquiry ordered; DCI Headquarters to file final report within two weeks.
Judges
GL Nzioka
Legal Topics
Habeas Corpus, Enforced Disappearance, Judicial Inquiry, Police Investigation
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Civil Procedure Habeas Corpus Enforced Disappearance Judicial Inquiry Police Investigation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samson Gebreigzi Teklemichael

Applicant

Republic of Kenya

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Directions on Habeas Corpus Application

  1. 1 Whether the applicant, Samson Gebreigzi Teklemichael, is being unlawfully detained by the police or state agents.
  2. 2 Whether the court should order the production of the applicant and his release.
  3. 3 Whether the ongoing police investigations are adequate and impartial.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there was no evidence that the applicant was being held by the police or any state agency at the time of the application. However, due to the lack of progress in police investigations, the applicant's loss of faith in the process, and the perception of bias given that implicated officers were from the same station conducting the investigation, the court determined that a judicial inquiry was necessary. The court ordered the DCI Headquarters to file a final report within two weeks and directed that an inquiry file be opened for a judicial inquiry to independently establish the whereabouts of the applicant and determine if any offence had been committed. The court...

Court Disposition

Directions issued; judicial inquiry ordered; DCI Headquarters to file final report within two weeks.

Orders

  • The DCI Headquarters shall avail its final report to the court within two weeks of the date of this order.
  • An inquiry file shall be opened and the matter subjected to judicial inquiry to independently establish the whereabouts of the victim and/or commission of any offence and recommend necessary action.