[2020] KEHC 5285 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had established a sufficient basis for granting witness protection orders. The witnesses in question are minors who possess crucial information in ongoing murder cases and face real threats to their safety from community hostility and the inability of the police to protect them....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 5285 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kitui
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application 12 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Chamber Summons for Witness Protection Orders
- Outcome
- application granted
- Judges
- LN Mutende
- Legal Topics
- Witness Protection, In Camera Testimony, Protection of Minors, Redaction of Identifying Information
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Republic
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Ex Parte Chamber Summons for Witness Protection Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should grant witness protection orders for vulnerable witnesses in ongoing murder trials.
- 2 Whether the witnesses should be allowed to testify in camera, use pseudonyms, and have their identities concealed.
- 3 Whether identifying information should be redacted from materials supplied to the accused.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had established a sufficient basis for granting witness protection orders. The witnesses in question are minors who possess crucial information in ongoing murder cases and face real threats to their safety from community hostility and the inability of the police to protect them. The court determined that the interests of justice and public interest require the granting of protection measures, including in camera testimony, use of pseudonyms, redaction of identifying information, and the sealing of the application file. The orders are necessary to facilitate the witnesses' testimony and ensure their safety, as provided for under the Witness Protection Act...
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- A witness protection order is issued for the protected witnesses in High Court Criminal Case No 3/2020, 4/2020 and 6/2020 to testify in camera or closed session.
- Any identifying information shall be redacted from the witnesses’ statements and materials to be supplied to the accused persons.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
In re Application for Orders for Witness Protection (Miscellaneous Application 12 of 2020) [2020] KEHC 5285 (KLR) (15 May 2020) (Ruling)
In re Matter of Application for Orders for Witness Protection [2020] eKLR
Neutral citation: [2020] KEHC 5285 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kitui
Miscellaneous Application 12 of 2020
LN Mutende, J
May 15, 2020
N THE MATTER OF ARTICLE 50 OF THE CONSTITUTION IN THE MATTER OF THE WITNESS PROTECTION ACT IN THE MATTER OF THE WITNESS PROTECTION RULES, 2015 AND IN THE MATTER OF APPLICATION FOR ORDERS FOR WITNESS PROTECTION
In the matter of
Republic
Applicant
Ruling
1. The applicant approached this court by way of chamber summons, ex-parte, seeking orders pursuant to article 50 of the Constitution, rule 3(1)(2) of the High Court (Practice and Procedure) Rules, section 4(3)(a)(b)(c) and section 16 of theWitness Protection Act, and Regulation 5(6) of the Witness Protection Regulations, 2011, rule 4, 5 and 9 of the Witness Protection Rules, 2015, seeking orders as follows:a.That this honourable court be pleased to grant witness protection orders for the protected witnesses in High Court Criminal Cases No 3/2020, 4/2020 and 6/2020 at the High Court in Kitui to testify in camera or closed session.b.That this honourable court be pleased to grant witness protection orders for any identifying information to be redacted from the witness’ statements and materials in the above stated cases before being supplied to the accused persons.c.That this honourable court be pleased to grant witness protection orders for the said protected witnesses to testify using pseudonyms.d.That this honourable court be pleased to grant witness protection orders for the protected witnesses’ identity to be concealed while giving evidence.e.That the miscellaneous application file germane to this application be kept under lock and key.f.That this honourable court be pleased to grant any such orders it deems fit in the circumstances.
2. The application is premised on grounds that: The applicant had under its protection vulnerable witnesses in High Court Criminal Case No 3/2020; 4/2020; and 6/2020, at Kitui; the crucial witnesses’ lives are in danger because of evidence they have agreed to give in support of the matter and the stated witnesses are in the process of being admitted into the witness protection programme as per the requirement of section 7 of the Witness Protection Act.
3. Further, that, unless protection orders are granted, there is a high risk of the witnesses being threatened, intimidated and/or harmed, therefore, it is in the public interest and justice that protection orders be issued to protect the witnesses and to facilitate their testimony.
4. The application is supported by an affidavit deponed by Carlos Ekuton, a senior protection officer at the Witness Protection Agency (WPA) who deposes that the agency received referrals for protection and following the risk assessment conducted they established that the protected persons who are minors who had agreed to testify were in the process of being admitted into the witness protection programme under the WPA.
5. That persons accused are charged in Criminal Cases No 3/2020, 4/2020 and 6/2020 with the offence of murder at Kitui High Court. These individuals have sympathizers in the local community that have demonstrated hostility towards the minors through the act of mob justice against their deceased mother.
6. That the witnesses (minors) have crucial information concerning events that happened prior and during the act of murder therefore their lives are in danger; and this therefore calls for provision of witness protection.
7. I have considered the application; affidavit evidence and annextures thereto. The basis upon which the witnesses should be included in the witness protection programme are well laid down. An understanding was reached between the participants and the Director, WPA. It has been established that the participants will be witnesses in criminal proceedings as they have already recorded statements. The police have expressed their inability to guarantee their safety in the course of proceedings. Their relationship with the alleged victim in the criminal proceedings, has been set out. It is therefore apparent that their lives may be in danger. In the result, the application is meritorious. Therefore, I grant orders as follows:(i)A witness protection order be and is hereby issued for the protected witness in High Court Criminal Case No 3/2020, 4/2020 and 6/2020 to testify in camera or closed session.(ii)Any identifying information shall be redacted from the witnesses’ statements and materials to be supplied to the accused persons.(iii)The protected witnesses shall testify using pseudonyms.(iv)The protected witnesses’ identity shall be concealed while giving evidence.(v)The miscellaneous application file germane shall be kept under key and lock.
8. it is so ordered.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIA EMAIL THIS 15TH DAY OF MAY, 2020. L. N. MUTENDEJUDGE