[2008] KEHC 2913 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants satisfied all statutory and regulatory requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001 and the Children (Adoption) Regulations, 2005. The applicants had been married for over three years, were of appropriate age, and demonstrated financial stability and commitment to the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2008] KEHC 2913 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: P. W. G.; Applicant: I. K. G.; Respondent: Director, Children’s Services
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 180 of 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- adoption granted
- Judges
- BP Kubo
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Procedure, Child Welfare, Parental Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
P. W. G.
Applicant
I. K. G.
Applicant
Director, Children’s Services
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants meet the statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001.
- 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child.
- 3 Whether the consent of the biological parents can be dispensed with due to abandonment.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants satisfied all statutory and regulatory requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001 and the Children (Adoption) Regulations, 2005. The applicants had been married for over three years, were of appropriate age, and demonstrated financial stability and commitment to the child’s welfare. The child had been abandoned at birth and declared free for adoption by a registered adoption society. The Director of Children’s Services and the guardian ad litem both recommended the adoption, and a legal guardian was appointed in the event of the applicants' death. The court determined that the adoption was in the best interests of the child and that the...
Court Disposition
adoption granted
Orders
- The applicants, P. W. G. and I. K. G., are authorized to adopt the child, A. S. A., who shall henceforth be known as R. W. K.
- The Registrar-General is directed to make appropriate entries in the Adopted Children Register as required by law.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
30 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS)
Adoption Cause 180 of 2006
IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN ACT, 2001
AND
IN THE MATTER OF ASA (A CHILD)
JUDGMENT
By originating summons dated 14. 11. 06, P. W. G. and I. K. G. of P.O. Box No.[Particulars withheld], Nairobi applied, inter alia, for the following order, namely:-
THAT the applicants be authorized to adopt A. S. A., to be known as R. W. K.
At the hearing of the application, the applicants were represented by learned counsel, Miss H.K. Kang’ethe.
The law under which the application was brought was initially not stated. When the matter was drawn to applicants’ counsel’s attention, she filed a supplementary affidavit sworn on 18. 03. 08 citing Part XII of the Children Act, 2001 generally and section 154 in particular. No copy of the applicant’s marriage certificate was annexed to the statement in support of the application as stated therein but it was later availed vide the supplementary affidavit. Such omissions do not reflect well on counsel.
Salient facts pertaining to the application may be summarized as under.
The applicants are Kenyan citizens. They are wife and husband, respectively, having got married to each other on 05. 06. 04 at Nairobi under the African Christian Marriage and Divorce Act, Cap.151. They have been married for about 3½ years but have not been blessed with any children owing to medical problems on the part of the 1st applicant, hence their decision to adopt. Regulation 19 (d) of the Children (Adoption) Regulations, 2005 (Legal Notice No.43 of 2005) is to the effect that adopters, in the case of joint applicants, should have been married for at least three years prior to the date of commencement of adoption arrangements. This requirement has been met.
The 1st applicant, P. W. G. was born on 18. 09. 71 and is aged around 26 years. The 2nd applicant, I. K. G. was born on 31. 12. 70 and is aged about 27 years. The child to be adopted, a Kenyan girl, was born on (particulars withheld) and is aged (particulars withheld). Section 158 (1) (a) of the Children Act is to the effect that for the applicants to qualify as adoptive parents, they or at least one of them should have attained the age of 25 years and be at least 21 years older than the child but should not have attained the age of 65 years. These statutory age requirements have been met.
Both applicants are in the tourism industry. The 1st applicant earns about Kshs.20,000/= per month. The 2nd applicant earns Kshs.100,000/= net per month. They own ¼
acre of land at Syokimau in Mlolongo on the way from Nairobi to Athi River. The plot is not yet developed but the applicants intend to build a house there for themselves. It is the applicants’ intention that the child to be adopted should inherit their estate.
The 1st applicant, who gave oral evidence before me, confirmed that she and the 2nd applicant have bonded well with the child, whom they have fostered since September, 2005.
The child to be adopted was abandoned by her biological mother at (particulars withheld), Nairobi immediately after birth and has not been claimed by anybody.
Little Angels Network, a registered adoption society in Kenya has declared the child free for adoption as required by law.
The child’s guardian ad litem, P. W. K. has recommended the proposed adoption.
W. K. a resident of Nairobi and of P.O. Box [particulars withheld], Thika has consented to act as the child’s legal guardian in the event that the applicants die before the child attains majority age.
The Director, Children’s Services has reported that the applicants have bonded with the child. The said Director has also recommended the proposed adoption.
The child was abandoned immediately after birth and has not been claimed. I dispense with the child’s biological parents’ consent to the proposed adoption.
I am satisfied on evidence tendered before court that the applicants meet the legal requirements and social parameters for adoptive parents, that the applicants are fit and proper persons to adopt the child and that it is in the child’s best interests to be adopted by the applicants. Accordingly, I make an order under section 154 (1) of the Children Act, 2001 authorising the applicants, P. W. G. and I. K. G. to adopt the child, A. S. A. who shall henceforth be known as R. W. K.
The Registrar – General is directed to make appropriate entries in the Adopted Children Register as required by law.
Orders accordingly.
Delivered at Nairobi this 21st day of April, 2008.
B.P. KUBO
JUDGE