[2015] KEHC 7212 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants, being the biological mother and her husband, had demonstrated the requisite emotional and financial capacity to care for the child. All statutory reports were favourable and recommended the adoption. The child had bonded with the applicants and considered them her parents. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEHC 7212 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: A Q N A; Applicant: A Q A; Respondent: A F
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 179 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Adoption granted.
- Judges
- DN Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Procedure, Best Interests of Child, Parental Rights, Guardianship
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A Q N A
Applicant
A Q A
Applicant
A F
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants meet the legal requirements for adoption under the Children.s Act.
- 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child.
- 3 Whether the applicants are fit and proper persons to assume parental responsibility for the child.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants, being the biological mother and her husband, had demonstrated the requisite emotional and financial capacity to care for the child. All statutory reports were favourable and recommended the adoption. The child had bonded with the applicants and considered them her parents. The adoption was arranged through a registered agency, and the child was declared free for adoption. The court held that it was in the best interests of the child to be adopted by the applicants, who would assume all parental rights and duties. The adoption order would be final and binding, and the child would have the right to inherit from the applicants. The court also appointed...
Court Disposition
Adoption granted.
Orders
- The applicants, A Q N A and A Q A, are permitted to adopt A F, to be known as A Q A.
- M R S and A Z S are appointed legal guardians of the child should misfortune befall the applicants during the child.s minority.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
20 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MILIMANI
ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 179 OF 2014 (OS)
AND
IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN’S ACT
(NO. 8 OF 2001)
AND
IN THE MATTER OF BABY A F
JUDGEMENT
1. The applicants, A Q N A and A Q A, are of Kenyan and Tanzanian nationality respectively. They are a married couple. By their Originating Summons dated 9th July 2014, they seek to adopt a female child called A F.
2. The subject child, A F, was born on 1st December 2003 in Pakistan to the female applicant and another during a previous marriage which ended after a divorce. The female applicant later met the male applicant and moved in together with him and later married him formally in a ceremony in 2008. The male applicant took in the child. The couple have since had two biological children of their own. The record indicates that the biological parents of the child separated when the mother was still pregnant with the child. The biological father and the child therefore never got to interact.
3. This adoption is being arranged by the Little Angels Network adoption agency. The said adoption agency declared the child free for adoption through their certificate of 26th March 2014.
4. To facilitate this adoption, the applicants have been assessed by the Little Angels Network adoption agency, the guardian ad litem, S D, and the Director of Children Services. All three have compiled and filed their reports in court. The report by the Director of Children Services is dated 29th January 2015, while that by the Little Angels Network is dated 26th March 2014. The report of the guardian ad litem is dated 13th November 2014.
5. All these reports are favourable and recommend the proposed adoption. The applicants have demonstrated that they have the financial and emotional capability and capacity to take care of the child. The child appears to have bonded well with them and she considers them to be her parents. I note that the applicants have two biological children of their own, and that the female applicant is the biological mother of the child in issue.
6. In the opinion of this court it would be in the best interests of the child that she is adopted by the applicants. The applicants will be able to provide a home and a family for the child to grow up in and thereafter be a useful member of the family. Consequently, the applicants shall assume all parental rights and duties of the biological parents in respect of the adopted child; they shall treat the adopted child as if she was born to them. The applicants have been made aware that once the adoption order is made it shall be final and binding during the lifetime of the child and that the child shall have the right to inherit their property. The applicants cannot give up the child owing to any subsequent unforeseen behaviour or other changes in the child.
7. This being an adoption within the family, I find that the application before me has merit and I hereby permit the applicants, A Q N A and A Q A, to adopt A F to be known hereafter as A Q A. I hereby appoint M R S and A Z S the child’s legal guardians should misfortune befall the applicants during the child’s minority. I direct the Registrar-General to enter this adoption order in the adoption register. The guardian ad litemis hereby discharged.
Dated, signed and delivered at Nairobi this 10th day of April 2015.
W MUSYOKA
JUDGE
In the presence of Ms. Kalsi advocate for the applicants.