[2018] KEHC 1622 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant, JWM, satisfied all statutory and social requirements for adoption under the Children Act. The child, Baby AJ, was abandoned and has been under the applicant's continuous care since 2014. Reports from the adoption society, guardian ad litem, and the Director of Children’s Services...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 1622 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: JWM; Respondent: Baby AJ
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 51 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Adoption granted.
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Procedure, Best Interests of Child, Legal Guardianship
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
JWM
Applicant
Baby AJ
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant meets the legal and social requirements to adopt Baby AJ.
- 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child as required by law.
- 3 Whether all statutory and procedural safeguards for adoption have been satisfied.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant, JWM, satisfied all statutory and social requirements for adoption under the Children Act. The child, Baby AJ, was abandoned and has been under the applicant's continuous care since 2014. Reports from the adoption society, guardian ad litem, and the Director of Children’s Services all recommended the adoption, confirming the applicant's financial and emotional capacity to provide for the child. The court observed a strong bond between the applicant and the child, and noted that the applicant's family supports the adoption. The court held that the adoption was in the best interests of the child, as required by Article 53(2) of the Constitution and Section...
Court Disposition
Adoption granted.
Orders
- The applicant JWM is allowed to adopt Baby AJ, who shall henceforth be known as AJ Waithira Muturi.
- The child's date of birth is presumed to be 29th February, 2013, and place of birth Kiambu, Kenya.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
30 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI
ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 51 OF 2018 (O.S)
IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN’S ACT NO. 8 OF 2001
IN THE MATTER OF ADOPTION OF BABY A J
BY
JWM
JUDGMENT
1. The single Applicant JWM is a Kenyan citizen. She got married in Church in 1995 and was blessed with one (1) daughter. She and her husband wished to adopt the child known as Baby AJ, a minor of the female sex through the Originating Summons dated 16th April, 2018but the male applicant passed on before completion of the process. The Applicant indicates that she is a Business Woman and is financially stable.
2. The child who is the subject of this adoption was abandoned on 28th July, 2013 at Kiambu. Her mother left her in the care of a woman stating that she was going to the toilet but she did not return. The matter was reported at Kiambu Police Station, vide OB NO. 24/28/07/2013. The Baby was later taken to Kiambu District Hospital for safe custody. The baby was committed to the Mogra Rescue Centre through the children’s court at Kiambu vide P&C Case No. 46 of 2013 on 1st August, 2013.
3. A letter from the police dated 19th August, 2014 indicated that since the child was placed under the care of Mogra Rescue Centre no one had come forward to claim her. Any assistance towards the child’s best interest was recommended.
4. Prior to the hearing of the adoption application, KKPI Adoption Society prepared and filed a report in court. They also issued a certificate No. 566 dated 27th August, 2014 declaring the child free for adoption. The guardian ad litem John Njoroge Kiuna filed a report on 22nd November, 2018, which was favourable and recommended the adoption of the child by the Applicant.
5. An officer from the office of The Director of Children’s Services made home visits and established that the Applicant is financially and emotionally capable of providing for the up keep and education of the child. She filed a report on 27th September, 2018 recommending the adoption for reasons that the child stands to gain from the opportunities provided by becoming the daughter of the Applicant as opposed to living all her life in an institution as an abandoned child.
6. The child was in court during the hearing and appeared to have bonded well with the Applicant. She was vivacious and confident. She seemed to trust the Applicant and regard her as her parent. The Applicant’s family members are said to be aware of the proposed adoption and support it.
7. The Applicant meets the social parameters that are considered relevant to her taking on parental responsibility and custody of the child in this matter, on a permanent basis as would be conferred by the adoption order sought. The child was released to her for foster care on 29th March, 2014 vide a foster care agreement filed in court as exhibit 7 and has been in her continuous care and protection since then.
8. LWN, a younger sister to the Applicant, consented to be appointed the legal guardian in the event that the Applicant is incapacitated and cannot care for the child.
9. It is important to note that, the orders sought by the Applicants relate to a child. In any matter concerning a child the best interests of a child are what is of paramount importance as provided for under Article 53(2) of the Constitution and section 4(3) of the Children Act No. 8 of 2001.
10. After a careful assessment of the reports filed herein and from the observation of the interaction of the Applicant and the child during the hearing, this court has formed the opinion that it would be in the best interest of the child to be adopted by the Applicant.
11. Reasons wherefore I allow the prayers sought in the Originating Summons dated 16th April, 2018 and order as follows:
i. The Applicant, JWM is hereby allowed to adopt Baby AJwho shall henceforth be known asAJ Waithira Muturi.
ii. Her date of birth shall be presumed to be 29th February, 2013. She is presumed to have been born in Kenya in accordance with Article 14(4) of the Constitution, and the place of birth shall be Kiambu.
iii. LWN, is hereby appointed legal guardian of the child in the event that the Applicant dies, or is incapacitated by ill-health.
iv. The Registrar General is directed to enter this Order in the Adoption Register.
v. The Director of Immigration is hereby authorised to issue the child with a Kenyan passport.
vi. The guardian ad litem is hereby discharged.
It is so ordered.
SIGNED DATED and DELIVERED in open court this18th day of December, 2018.
L. A. ACHODE
HIGH COURT JUDGE