[2014] KEHC 2030 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants, B E L S and K U S, satisfied all statutory requirements for international adoption under the Children’s Act, No. 8 of 2001. The child, Baby A M, was abandoned and has been under the applicants' continuous foster care. Reports from the adoption society, the Director of Children’s...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 2030 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: B E L S; Applicant: K U S
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 186 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- adoption granted
- Judges
- LA Achode
- Legal Topics
- International Adoption, Child Custody, Adoption Procedure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
B E L S
Applicant
K U S
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants meet the legal requirements for international adoption under Kenyan law.
- 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child.
- 3 Whether the adoption will be recognized in the applicants' home country.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants, B E L S and K U S, satisfied all statutory requirements for international adoption under the Children’s Act, No. 8 of 2001. The child, Baby A M, was abandoned and has been under the applicants' continuous foster care. Reports from the adoption society, the Director of Children’s Services, and the guardian ad litem were all favorable, confirming the applicants' suitability and the child's best interests. The court also considered the recognition of the adoption in Sweden, as evidenced by the Swedish Migration Board's letter. The court concluded that the adoption would serve the best interests of the child and that all procedural and substantive legal...
Court Disposition
adoption granted
Orders
- The applicants, B E L S and K U S, are allowed to adopt the child, Baby A M, who shall be known as A O L S.
- E K M L and O M L are appointed legal guardians of the child should misfortune befall the applicants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
28 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 186 OF 2014 (O.S.)
AND
IN THE MATTER OF CHILDREN’S ACT, No. 8 of 2001
AND
IN THE MATTER OF BABY A.M.
B E L S ……………………………………1ST APPLICANT
AND
K U S ……………………………………2ND APPLICANT
JUDGMENT
1. The applicants, B E L S and K U S are of Swedish origin and in a monogamous marriage which was solemnized at the Registrar of Marriages, Uppsala City Hall on 16th January 2000. They have no child of their own. They have brought a Chamber Summons dated 25th July 2014 seeking permission to adopt the baby A M, an infant of male sex. He was presumed to have been born on 20th November 2012. B E L S is a Systems Developer with [particulars withheld] University, while K U S is a Senior Analyst with [particulars withheld]. They reside in Sunne, Sweden and profess the Christian faith.
2. The child was abandoned by unknown person on 8th January 2013 at Eve Petrol Station, Ngurubani. He was rescued by two good Samaritans one A K N and his wife E G.
3. The matter was reported to Wanguru Police Station and booked vide Occurrence Book No. 17/7/12/2012. He was later released to New Life Home Trust, Nyeri and later transferred to New Life Home Trust, Nairobi on 17th May 2013. He was committed by the Nairobi Children’s Court through case No. 72 of 2012 to the custody of the said Children’s Home on 20th December 2012 pending formal adoption proceedings.
4. The child was released into the custody of the Applicants for mandatory foster care pending adoption, pursuant to a foster care agreement signed on 25th April 2014. Since then the child has been in the continuous custody and care of the Applicants.
5. Prior to the hearing of the adoption application, New Life Home Trust, Nairobi, an adoption Society prepared and filed a report in court. A certificate dated 4th December 2013 declaring the child free for adoption was issued by Little Angels Network. The Director of Children’s Services also filed a report dated 3rd September 2014 as did the guardian ad litem, M/s. F D A O. Both reports were favourable and recommended the adoption of the child by the Applicants.
6. According to the letter dated 11th August 2008 from the Swedish Migration Board, a Kenyan adoption would be recognised in Sweden and further, adoptions performed in accordance with the Hague Convention are automatically valid in Sweden.
7. From the foregoing I am satisfied that all the legal requirements for an international adoption have been met, and consequently I will make the following orders:
a) That the Applicants, B E L S and K U S, are hereby allowed to adopt the child, Baby A M, who shall be hereinafter known as A O L S;
b) That E K M L and O M L are hereby appointed the legal guardians of the child should misfortune befall the applicants;
c) That the Registrar-General is directed to enter this adoption order in the Adoption Register;
d) That the child is presumed to be Kenyan by birth.
e) That the Director of Immigration is hereby authorised to issue the child with a Kenyan passport.
It is so ordered.
SIGNED DATEDandDELIVEREDin open court this 31st day of October 2014.
…………………………………….
L. A. ACHODE
JUDGE