[2018] KEHC 2366 (KLR)

[2018] KEHC 2366 (KLR)

The court found that the Applicants had complied with all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children.s Act No. 8 of 2001. The reports from the adoption agency, guardian ad litem, and the Director of Children Services all recommended the adoption, confirming the Applicants. suitability and the child.s...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2018] KEHC 2366 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: M M M; Applicant: M K M M; Respondent: Baby B K (to be known as E N M)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Adoption Cause 185 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Outcome
adoption granted
Judges
LA Achode
Legal Topics
Adoption Procedure, Best Interests of Child, Parental Consent, Local Adoption
Source Language
en
Family and Children Adoption Procedure Best Interests of Child Parental Consent Local Adoption

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

M M M

Applicant

M K M M

Applicant

Baby B K (to be known as E N M)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Adoption Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Applicants have met the legal requirements for adoption under the Children.s Act No. 8 of 2001.
  2. 2 Whether it is in the best interests of the child to be adopted by the Applicants.
  3. 3 Whether the consent of the biological father can be dispensed with.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Applicants had complied with all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children.s Act No. 8 of 2001. The reports from the adoption agency, guardian ad litem, and the Director of Children Services all recommended the adoption, confirming the Applicants. suitability and the child.s welfare. The biological mother.s consent was validly obtained, and the biological father.s consent was properly dispensed with due to his unknown whereabouts. The court determined that the adoption was in the best interests of the child, who had bonded with the Applicants and would benefit from their care. The court therefore allowed the adoption and made consequential orders...

Court Disposition

adoption granted

Orders

  • The Applicants, M M M and M K M M, are allowed to adopt Baby B K, who shall henceforth be known as E N M.
  • The child.s date of birth is declared as 26th August, 2016, and place of birth as Nairobi, Kenya.