[2018] KEHC 5998 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption, including comprehensive assessments by the Kenya Children’s Homes, the Director of Children Services, and the guardian ad litem, all of which were favourable. The child had been abandoned, and no biological parent had come...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 5998 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Charles Okoth Omoroh; Applicant: I A O; Respondent: N O
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 183 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- adoption granted
- Judges
- DN Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Procedure, Child Welfare, Parental Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Charles Okoth Omoroh
Applicant
I A O
Applicant
N O
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants meet the legal requirements for adoption under Kenyan law.
- 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child.
- 3 Whether due process regarding abandonment and consent has been followed.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption, including comprehensive assessments by the Kenya Children’s Homes, the Director of Children Services, and the guardian ad litem, all of which were favourable. The child had been abandoned, and no biological parent had come forward. The applicants demonstrated the capacity to provide for the child’s welfare, and the child had bonded with them. The court determined that adoption was in the best interests of the child, granting the applicants full parental rights and duties, and ensuring the child’s right to inherit from them. The adoption order is final and binding, and the applicants cannot...
Court Disposition
adoption granted
Orders
- The applicants, Charles Okoth Omoroh and I A O, are allowed to adopt Baby D O alias D O O, who shall hereafter be known as D O O.
- The child is declared Kenyan by birth and was born on 23rd July 2003.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
(FAMILY DIVISION)
ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 183 OF 2014
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR ADOPTION OF BABY D O alias D O O
JUDGEMENT
1. The applicants, Charles Okoth Omoroh and I A O, are Kenyan citizens. They are a married couple. They seek to adopt Baby D O alias D O O. Their Originating Summons is dated 1st July2014.
2. The child in question was born on 28th July 2003 at the Pumwani Maternity Hospital to a known mother. His biological mother abandoned the child at the Kenyatta National Hospital on 20th August 2005. No one came to claim him thereafter. He was placed with the Missionaries of Mercy children’s home, and to that institution he was later to be committed by the Nairobi Children’s Court. A report of the abandonment was made at the Kilimani Police Station, and since then the police have been unable to trace the child’s parents. The child was freed for adoption on 23rd November 2012 by the KKPI Adoption Society by their certificate number [Particulars withheld]. The child was placed with the applicants on 12th August 2013, and has been with them since.
3. To facilitate this adoption, the applicants have been assessed by the Kenya Children’s Homes, the Director of Children Services and the guardian ad litem, J O W. The three have compiled and filed their reports in court. The report by the Director of Children Services is dated 11th April 2018, while that of the guardian ad litemis dated 17th November 2014. The report by the KKPI Adoption Society is dated 16th September 2014. All these reports are favourable and recommend the proposed adoption. The applicants have demonstrated that they have the financial and emotional capability and capacity to take care of the child. The child himself appears to have bonded well with them and he considers them to be his parents. I note that the male applicant has another wife and other children of his own.
4. In the opinion of this court it would be in the best interests of the child that he is adopted by the applicants. The applicants will be able to provide a home and a family for the child to grow up in. Consequently, the applicants shall assume all parental rights and duties of the biological parents in respect of the adopted child; they shall treat the adopted child as if he was born to them. The applicants have been made aware that once the adoption order is made it shall be final and binding during the lifetime of the child and that the child shall have the right to inherit their property. The applicants cannot give up the child owing to any subsequent unforeseen behaviour or other changes in the child.
5. I am satisfied that all the legal requirements for a local adoption have been met, and I therefore make the following orders:-
(a) That the applicants, C O O and I A O, are hereby allowed to adopt the child Baby D O alias D O O, who shall hereafter be known D O O;
(b) That the said child is Kenyan by birth and was born on 23rd July 2003;
(c) That N O is hereby appointed legal guardian of the child in the event something untoward happens to the applicants;
(d) That the Registrar-General is hereby directed to enter this adoption order in the adoption register; and
(e) That the guardian ad litemis hereby discharged.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 14TH DAY OF JUNE, 2018.
W. MUSYOKA
JUDGE