[2016] KEHC 6466 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had satisfied all legal requirements for adoption as set out in the Children Act, 2001. The applicants demonstrated financial stability, good health, and a stable family environment. The child, having been abandoned and declared free for adoption, had bonded well with the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 6466 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: S M K; Applicant: C M M
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 6 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- adoption granted
- Judges
- REA Ougo
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Procedure, Best Interests of Child, Guardianship Appointment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
S M K
Applicant
C M M
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have met the legal requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001.
- 2 Whether it is in the best interests of the child to be adopted by the applicants.
- 3 Whether the appointment of a legal guardian is appropriate in the circumstances.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had satisfied all legal requirements for adoption as set out in the Children Act, 2001. The applicants demonstrated financial stability, good health, and a stable family environment. The child, having been abandoned and declared free for adoption, had bonded well with the applicants during the mandatory placement period. Both the guardian ad litem and the Department of Children Services provided favorable reports, confirming the applicants' suitability. The court determined that adoption by the applicants was in the best interests of the child, ensuring the child's welfare, stability, and entitlement to all rights of a Kenyan citizen. The court also...
Court Disposition
adoption granted
Orders
- The applicants S M K and C M M are authorized to adopt baby E, who shall henceforth be called E M M.
- K M is appointed as the legal guardian of the child should misfortune befall the applicants.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
ADOPTION CAUSE NO.6 OF 2015
IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN ACT NUMBER 8 OF 2001
AND
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR ADOPTION OF BABY E
S M K….…….…..………………..………1ST APPLICANT
AND
C M M………………….………….2ND APPLICANT
JUDGMENT
1. The applicants S M K and C M M are seeking to be authorized to adopt baby E and if the said application is allowed hereinafter referred to as the child. They also seek that upon making the adoption the child be called E M M. They also seek that K M be appointed the legal Guardian of the child.
2. The applicants are Kenyan citizens born in 1971 and 1972 respectively. They got married on 11th April 1998. The 1st applicant is a marketer working at [particulars withhheld] Co. Ltd. While the 2nd applicant is a librarian. The applicants have one biological son and one adopted daughter. They are both of good health and do not have any criminal record.
3. Baby E is estimated to have been born on 16th November 2011 and was reported to have been abandoned by the mother at Katheka Kai area in Machakos on 18th November 2011 and was rescued by good Samaritans who reported the same to Machakos Police Station via OB no. 44/23/11/2011. On 23/11/2011 the child was admitted to Springs of Hope Children’s Center a Children’s home for care and protection and care. The Child was committed to the home by RM Machakos Children’s Court vide Committal order P&C No. 94/2011dated 15th December 2011. The child was declared free for adoption by Little Angels Network on 23rd January 2013 and was issued with a certificate of declaration of declaring a child free for adoption no. [particulars withhheld]. The child was placed with the applicants for mandatory bonding period prior to the adoption on 25th January 2013 and has been in their care ever since.
4. The applicants have met the necessary pre-requisites to adopt the child as prescribed in the Children Act 2001. The guardian ad litem filed her report on 5th May 2015 while the Department of Children services filed its report on 17th August 2015. Both reports are favorable and recommend that the applicants are suitable to adopt and that they be allowed to adopt. Investigations reveal that the child has bonded well with the applicant. The child was observed to be happy and is well adjusted to his home. The applicants are financially stable and able to provide for the needs of the child.
5. It is evident that the applicants have fulfilled all the legal requirements relating to the adoption of the child. This court is satisfied that the applicants are qualified and able to take care of the child. It is evident that the applicants are financially stable and capable to provide for the upkeep and education of the child and in the period that the applicants have had the custody of the child, the child has bonded well with them.
6. This court finds that it would be in the best interest of the child to be adopted by the applicants. I allow the applicants application for adoption. The Applicants S M K and C M M are hereby authorized to adopt baby E whom shall henceforth be called E M M. K M has been appointed the legal Guardian of the child should misfortune befall the applicants. I direct the Registrar General to enter this order in the adoption register. The child was born in Kenya and is therefore a Kenyan by birth and is entitled all the rights that accrue to Kenyan citizens under the Kenya Constitution 2010 and the Kenya citizenship and Immigration Act. I hereby discharge the Guardian ad litem. It is so order.
Dates, Signed and delivered this 26th Day of February 2016.
R. E. OUGO
JUDGE
In the presence of:
……………..……………....….For the Applicants
Ms. Charity Court Clerk