[2025] KEHC 3535 (KLR)

[2025] KEHC 3535 (KLR)

The Court found that the Applicants, a married couple with the 1st Applicant as the biological mother and the 2nd Applicant seeking kinship adoption, met all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children’s Act No. 29 of 2022. The child, aged 17, consented to the adoption and the change of name. Reports from...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] KEHC 3535 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: BAO; Applicant: EST; Respondent: FAO
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Adoption Cause E049 of 2025
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Outcome
adoption granted
Judges
CJ Kendagor
Legal Topics
Adoption of Minors, Kinship Adoption, Best Interests of Child, Legal Guardianship
Source Language
en
Family and Children Adoption of Minors Kinship Adoption Best Interests of Child Legal Guardianship

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

BAO

Applicant

EST

Applicant

FAO

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Adoption Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the 2nd Applicant EST should be authorized to adopt the minor FO.
  2. 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child as required by law.
  3. 3 Whether the appointment of FAO as legal guardian is appropriate.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the Applicants, a married couple with the 1st Applicant as the biological mother and the 2nd Applicant seeking kinship adoption, met all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children’s Act No. 29 of 2022. The child, aged 17, consented to the adoption and the change of name. Reports from the Department of Children’s Services, the adoption society, and the guardian ad litem confirmed the Applicants’ suitability and the positive, stable relationship between the child and the 2nd Applicant. The Court emphasized the best interests of the child as the paramount consideration, noting the child’s maturity, willingness, and the urgency due to his impending attainment...

Court Disposition

adoption granted

Orders

  • The 2nd Applicant EST is authorized to adopt the child known as FO, the biological child of the 1st Applicant.
  • Upon adoption, the child shall be known as FFT.