[2023] KEHC 24827 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 24827 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants, a married couple aged 41 and 40, had fulfilled all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2022. The biological mother had given valid consent, and the child was declared free for adoption by the KKPI Adoption Society. Reports from the guardian ad litem and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 24827 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: EWM; Applicant: DMK; Respondent: HMO (minor)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Adoption Cause E021 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Outcome
adoption granted
Judges
PM Nyaundi
Legal Topics
Adoption Procedure, Best Interests of Child, Parental Consent, Legal Guardianship
Source Language
en
Family and Children Adoption Procedure Best Interests of Child Parental Consent Legal Guardianship

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

EWM

Applicant

DMK

Applicant

HMO (minor)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Adoption Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have met the legal requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2022.
  2. 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child as required by Article 53 of the Constitution and Section 8 of the Children Act, 2022.
  3. 3 Whether the consent of the biological mother was validly obtained and the child is free for adoption.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants, a married couple aged 41 and 40, had fulfilled all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2022. The biological mother had given valid consent, and the child was declared free for adoption by the KKPI Adoption Society. Reports from the guardian ad litem and Department of Children Services confirmed the applicants' suitability and the child's well-being in their care. The court emphasized that the best interests of the child are paramount, as mandated by Article 53 of the Constitution and Section 8 of the Children Act. The child, who has lived with the applicants since 2019, recognizes them as parents and is well cared for. The court...

Court Disposition

adoption granted

Orders

  • The applicants EWM and DMK are allowed to adopt HMO.
  • The child shall be known as HMK.