[2015] KEHC 1795 (KLR)

[2015] KEHC 1795 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants had fulfilled all statutory and regulatory requirements for international adoption, including approvals from both Norwegian and Kenyan authorities, and had maintained custody of the child for the required period, facilitating bonding. The court held that the government moratorium...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2015] KEHC 1795 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: T T- H; Applicant: K T- H
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Adoption Cause 115 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Outcome
adoption granted
Judges
MW Muigai
Legal Topics
International Adoption, Best Interests of Child, Adoption Moratorium, Parental Rights and Duties
Source Language
en
Family and Children International Adoption Best Interests of Child Adoption Moratorium Parental Rights and Duties

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

T T- H

Applicant

K T- H

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Adoption Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the applicants have met the legal requirements for international adoption under Kenyan law.
  2. 2 Whether the moratorium on inter-country adoptions applies to the present case.
  3. 3 Whether granting the adoption is in the best interests of the child.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had fulfilled all statutory and regulatory requirements for international adoption, including approvals from both Norwegian and Kenyan authorities, and had maintained custody of the child for the required period, facilitating bonding. The court held that the government moratorium on inter-country adoptions, declared on 27th November 2014, could not apply retrospectively to cases where approvals and relevant orders were granted prior to its commencement. The best interests of the child, as enshrined in the Constitution and Children Act, required that the child be placed in a stable, loving family environment. The absence of a report from the Director of...

Court Disposition

adoption granted

Orders

  • The applicants, T T- H and K T- H, are authorized to adopt Baby J alias I, who shall henceforth be known as I T- H.
  • The child's date of birth is declared as 11th March, 2013, and place of birth as Thika, Kenya.