[2016] KEHC 7508 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children.s Act, including being assessed and recommended by the adoption agency, the Director of Children Services, and the guardian ad litem. The child, having been abandoned and unclaimed, was declared free for...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 7508 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: K M S; Applicant: N N M; Respondent: Baby L alias L H alias U B G (to be known as Lulu Mutisya)
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 272 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- adoption granted
- Judges
- DN Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Procedure, Child Welfare, Parental Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
K M S
Applicant
N N M
Applicant
Baby L alias L H alias U B G (to be known as Lulu Mutisya)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants meet the legal requirements for adoption under the Children.s Act.
- 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child.
- 3 Whether the child is eligible for adoption given her abandonment and status.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children.s Act, including being assessed and recommended by the adoption agency, the Director of Children Services, and the guardian ad litem. The child, having been abandoned and unclaimed, was declared free for adoption. The applicants demonstrated financial and emotional capacity to care for the child, who had bonded with them. The court determined that adoption by the applicants was in the best interests of the child, ensuring her welfare, stability, and right to family life. The adoption order would confer full parental rights and duties on the applicants, and the child would be...
Court Disposition
adoption granted
Orders
- The applicants, M S and N N M, are allowed to adopt the child Baby L alias L H alias U B G, to be known as Lulu Mutisya.
- The child shall be presumed Kenyan by birth as she was found abandoned within Kenyan borders.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MILIMANI
ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 272 OF 2014 (OS)
AND
IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN’S ACT
(NO. 8 OF 2001)
AND
IN THE MATTER OF BABY L alias L H alias U B G
JUDGEMENT
1. The applicants, K M S and N N M, are Kenyan citizens. They are a married couple. They seek to adopt Baby L alias L H alias U B G. Their originating summons is dated 20th November 2014.
2. The child in question was found abandoned by the roadside in the Jericho area of Nairobi on 11th July 2013 by a watchman. A report of the matter of the abandonment was made at the Jogoo Police Station. The child was admitted at the Hope House Babies Home for care and protection, where she was eventually formally committed by the Makadara Children’s Court. The police were unable to trace her biological parents.
3. The child was freed for adoption by the Little Angels Network adoption agency by its certificate of 26th February 2014. The child was placed with the applicants for the bonding period on 29th January 2014. It is presumed that the child was born on 1st May 2013.
4. To facilitate this adoption, the applicants have been assessed by the Little Angels Network, the Director of Children Services and the guardian ad litem, Steven Okong’o Ombok. The three have compiled and filed their reports in court. That of the Director of Children Services is dated 5th November 2015, while that of the guardian ad litemis dated 25th May 2015. The report by the Little Angels Network is dated 26th March 2014.
5. All these reports are favourable and recommend the proposed adoption. The applicants have demonstrated that they have the financial and emotional capability and capacity to take care of the child. The child herself appears to have bonded well with them and she considers them to be her parents.
6. In the opinion of this court it would be in the best interests of the child that she is adopted by the applicants. The applicants will be able to provide a home and a family for the child to grow up in and thereafter be a useful member of the family. Consequently, the applicants shall assume all parental rights and duties of the biological parents in respect of the adopted child; they shall treat the adopted child as if he was born to them. The applicants have been made aware that once the adoption order is made it shall be final and binding during the lifetime of the child and that the child shall have the right to inherit their property. The applicant cannot give up the child owing to any subsequent unforeseen behaviour or other changes in the child.
7. I am satisfied that all the legal requirements for a local adoption have been met, and I therefore make the following orders:-
(a) That the applicants, M S and N N M, are hereby allowed to adopt the child Baby L alias L H alias U B G, who shall hereafter be known Lulu Mutisya;
(b) That the subject child shall be presumed to be Kenyan by birth as she was found abandoned within Kenyan borders;
(c) That C K S and F N are hereby appointed legal guardians of the child in the event something untoward happens to the applicants;
(d) That the Registrar-General is hereby directed to enter this adoption order in the adoption register; and
(e) That the guardian ad litemis hereby discharged.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 24TH DAY OF MARCH, 2016.
W. MUSYOKA
JUDGE