[2019] KEHC 8280 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had fulfilled all statutory requirements for adoption, including the provision of necessary consents, a positive social inquiry report, and evidence of a stable, caring environment for the child. The applicants have fostered Baby L since 2009, have no biological children, and have...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 8280 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: A M M; Applicant: M K M
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Machakos
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 8 of 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Ruling
- Outcome
- Adoption order granted.
- Judges
- BC Koech
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Procedure, Child Welfare, Guardianship, Best Interests of Child
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A M M
Applicant
M K M
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants are suitable persons to adopt Baby L.
- 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of Baby L.
- 3 Whether all statutory requirements for adoption have been met.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had fulfilled all statutory requirements for adoption, including the provision of necessary consents, a positive social inquiry report, and evidence of a stable, caring environment for the child. The applicants have fostered Baby L since 2009, have no biological children, and have demonstrated a strong bond with the child. The Children’s Department and guardian ad litem both recommended the adoption, and the legal guardian consented to act. The court concluded that the adoption would serve the best interests of Baby L, who has been declared free for adoption and has been in the applicants’ care for several years. The court was satisfied as to the...
Court Disposition
Adoption order granted.
Orders
- The applicants A M M and M K M are authorized to adopt Baby L to be known as J M.
- P M M is appointed legal guardian of the minor.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
33 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MACHAKOS
ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 8 OF 2014
IN THE MATTER OF BABY L
AND ON THE APPLICATION FOR AN ADOPTION ORDER BY
1. A M M
2. MKM.....................................APPLICANTS
RULING
This application is brought by way of Originating Summons dated 9th October, 2013. The Applicants A M M and MKM through their advocates Kalinga & Co Advocates seek the following orders:
1. THAT JOHN KIAMBA of c/o Post Office Box Number 4 Wamunyu in the Republic of Kenya be appointed Guardian ad Litem.
2. THATthe Director-Children’s Department, Office of the Vice President, Ministry of Home Affairs investigates the applicants’ fitness to adopt and files a report.
3. THAT PMM be appointed Legal Guardian of the child.
4. THAT the Applicant be authorized to adopt the child L to be known as JM.
5. THAT the court be pleased to make any further orders it deems necessary.
1. In the preliminary stage, prayer 1 and 2 were granted by the court.
2. The Applicants A M MANDMKM are adults born in 1967 and 1969 respectively and residents of Katangi, Yatta Sub-County. Alfonce is a teacher whereas Margaret is a business lady. They have been married to each other since December 1992 and received the infant under their joint custody as from 10th December, 2009 and fostered her since then.
3. PMM swore an affidavit dated 9th October 2013 to confirm consent to act as Legal Guardian and that he has no objection to the Applicants adopting Baby L.
4. Baby Lwas born at Pumwani Maternity Hospital to biological parents BNN and JN and offered for adoption by them. She was delivered to Kenya Children’s Homes Adoption Society on 21. 3.2009 whereupon she was committed to the custody and care of the said home by the Senior Resident Magistrate at Nairobi Children’s Court via P& C No. 351 of 2009 on 14th August, 2009.
5. On 26th August, 2009, Baby L was declared free for adoption vide certificate issued on 26th August, 2009 and was placed in the care of the applicants from 10. 12. 2009.
6. On 22nd January, 2014 this Court directed the Director of Children Department, Office of the Vice President, Ministry of Home Affairs to investigate the applicants’ fitness to adopt the baby and file a report.
7. Nathan M. Kyule is the Sub-County Children’s Officer, Yatta. He conducted a Social Inquiry on the Applicants by visiting and interrogating them at their home on 27th May, 2016. It was observed that the Applicants have not been able to get their own biological child. They have never been separated ever since they married and have taken care of Baby Land bonded well with the said minor who seemed to have bonded well with them. Hence this adoption would be in her best interests. His conclusion is that the applicants have demonstrated ability to maintain baby L.On 9th May, 2017, Nathan M. Kyule, the Sub-County Children’s Officer, Yatta filed a favourable report as to the suitability of the Applicant to adopt baby L.
8. On9th May, 2017, Peter Ndotono Njuguna appeared in court to recommend the applicant’s application and to have the report dated 7. 5.14 confirming the suitability of the applicant to be adopted in the proceedings as well as informing court that this is the second adoption application by the applicants as they had made a previous one vide Machakos Adoption Cause 191 of 2008. PMMappeared before me on the same date to confirm and rely on the contents of his affidavit and willingness to take up his duties as well as recommend the applicants to adopt baby L. The applicants also appeared before me on the said date and relied on their affidavits to support the application and confirmed their readiness to care for the minor.
9. Constance Muasa, the Yatta Sub-County Children’s Officer appeared before me on 7. 11. 18 to adopt the report that was prepared by her colleague Nathan Kyule and dated 30. 12. 16
10. This court is satisfied that the Applicants are suitable persons to adopt Baby L and that they are financially stable and have the means to provide and care for her.
For the above reasons, the Court orders as follows;
1. THAT the Applicants AMM AND MKM be are hereby authorized to adopt Baby L to be known as JM.
2. THATPMM be and is hereby appointed Legal Guardian of the minor.
3. THATthe Registrar-General do make in the Adopted Children Register an entry recording the adoption in accordance with the particulars set out in the Schedule to this order.
4. THAT the guardian Ad litem is hereby discharged.
Dated and delivered at Machakos this 25th day of April, 2019.
D.K. KEMEI
JUDGE