[2014] KEHC 8349 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants, as the child.s grandparents, had provided continuous care since the death of the child.s father and that the child had bonded with them. All statutory reports were favourable, confirming the applicants. suitability and the child.s welfare. The biological mother consented to the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 8349 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: J M O; Applicant: J A M; Respondent: Baby M A
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 307 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- adoption granted
- Judges
- DN Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Adoption of Children, Kinship Adoption, Parental Rights, Child Welfare
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
J M O
Applicant
J A M
Applicant
Baby M A
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants meet the legal requirements for adoption under the Children.s Act.
- 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child.
- 3 Whether all procedural safeguards and assessments have been satisfied.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants, as the child.s grandparents, had provided continuous care since the death of the child.s father and that the child had bonded with them. All statutory reports were favourable, confirming the applicants. suitability and the child.s welfare. The biological mother consented to the adoption, and the applicants demonstrated the capacity to provide for the child. The court held that the adoption was in the best interests of the child, satisfying all legal requirements under the Children.s Act. The applicants were therefore granted parental rights and duties over the child, who would henceforth be treated as their own for all legal purposes, including...
Court Disposition
adoption granted
Orders
- The applicants, J M O and J A M, are allowed to adopt the child Baby M A, who shall hereafter be known as M A O.
- The child is declared Kenyan by birth.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MILIMANI
ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 307 OF 2013 (OS)
AND
IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN’S ACT
(NO. 8 OF 2001)
AND
IN THE MATTER OF BABY M A
JUDGEMENT
1. The applicants, J M O and J A M, are Kenyan citizens. They are a married couple. They seek to adopt Baby M A. Their originating summons is dated 6th December 2013.
2. The child in question was born on 28th December 2008 at the Pumwani Maternity Hospital, Nairobi. The father of the child was the son of the applicants, but he died in 2010. This is therefore a kinship adoption. The mother of the child took the child to the applicants, the child’s grandparents. The mother does menial jobs and has another child she is supporting on her own. She offered her for adoption and signed the relevant papers. The child has been with the applicants since 2010.
3. The child was freed for adoption by the Kenya Children’s Homes adoption society by their certificate of 31st December 2012.
4. To facilitate this adoption, the applicants have been assessed by the Kenya Children’s Homes, the Director of Children Services and the guardian ad litem, M O S. The three have compiled and filed their reports in court. That of the Director of Children Services is dated 23rd May 2014, while that of the guardian ad litemis dated 26th June 2014. The report by the Kenya Children’s Homes is dated 4th February 2014.
5. All these reports are favourable and recommend the proposed adoption. The applicants have demonstrated that they have the financial and emotional capability and capacity to take care of the child. The child herself appears to have bonded well with them and she considers them to be her parents. I have taken note of the fact that this is a case of grandparents adopting a child of their deceased son.
6. In the opinion of this court that it would be in the best interests of the child that she is adopted by the applicants. The applicants will be able to provide a home and a family for the child to grow up in and thereafter be a useful member of the family. Consequently, the applicants shall assume all parental rights and duties of the biological parents in respect of the adopted child; they shall treat the adopted child as if she was born to them. The applicants have been made aware that once the adoption order is made it shall be final and binding during the lifetime of the child and that the child shall have the right to inherit their property. The applicant cannot give up the child owing to any subsequent unforeseen behaviour or other changes in the child.
7. I am satisfied that all the legal requirements for a local adoption have been met, and I therefore make the following orders:-
(a) That the applicants, J M O and J A M, are hereby allowed to adopt the child Baby M A, who shall hereafter be known M A O;
(b) That the said child is hereby declared Kenyan by birth as she was born within Kenya by a known Kenyan mother.
(c) That M O O and E A O are hereby appointed legal guardians of the child in the event something untoward happens to the applicants;
(d) That the Registrar-General is hereby directed to enter this adoption order in the adoption register; and
(e) That the guardian ad litemis hereby discharged.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 24th DAY OF October 2014.
W. MUSYOKA
JUDGE
In the presence of Ms. Kibara for Ms. Ndegwa advocate for the applicant.