[2023] KEHC 17916 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 17916 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act 2022, including being declared suitable adoptive parents by relevant authorities, demonstrating financial stability, good character, and a supportive family environment. The subject child, having been...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 17916 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: FOO; Applicant: TAO
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Adoption Cause E210 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Outcome
adoption granted
Judges
MA Odero
Legal Topics
Adoption of Children, Child Abandonment, Best Interests of Child
Source Language
en
Family and Children Adoption of Children Child Abandonment Best Interests of Child

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

FOO

Applicant

TAO

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Adoption Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the applicants meet the legal prerequisites for adoption under the Children Act 2022.
  2. 2 Whether the subject child is eligible for adoption, including presumption of Kenyan citizenship.
  3. 3 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act 2022, including being declared suitable adoptive parents by relevant authorities, demonstrating financial stability, good character, and a supportive family environment. The subject child, having been abandoned and with unknown parents, was presumed a Kenyan citizen by birth under Article 14(4) of the Constitution. The requirement for parental consent was waived due to abandonment. Reports from the Adoption Agency, Guardian ad litem, and Director of Children’s Services were all positive and recommended the adoption. The court determined that the adoption was in the best interests...

Court Disposition

adoption granted

Orders

  • The applicants F O O and T A O are authorized to adopt the child known as Baby M S aka S.
  • Upon adoption the child will be known as A M O.