Kenya Judgment

High Court · High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)

In re Baby N aka N W N [2017] KEHC 1015 (KLR)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The court found that the applicants had fulfilled all legal requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001. The applicants demonstrated financial stability, emotional and physical fitness, and the ability to provide for the child. Reports from the Department of Children Services and the guardian ad litem confirmed the child had bonded well with the applicants and that the adoption was in her best interests. The child was abandoned, declared free for adoption, and placed with the applicants for a sufficient period. The court concluded that granting the adoption would serve the child's welfare and best interests, and thus allowed the application, changing the child's name and appointing legal guardians.

Court disposition

application for adoption allowed

Orders

  • The applicants S N M and A N N are authorized to adopt Baby N aka A W N.
  • The child shall henceforth be called A W N.
  • B N W and J K W are appointed legal guardians in the event of death or incapacity of the applicants before the child is of full age.
  • The Registrar General is directed to enter this order in the adoption register.
  • The guardian ad litem is discharged.

02

Material facts

Parties

S N M

Applicant Counsel: Mr. Kimathi h/b for Mr. Gatumuta

A N N

Applicant Counsel: Mr. Kimathi h/b for Mr. Gatumuta

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Adoption Cause / Judgment

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The applicants argued that they are financially, physically, and emotionally fit to parent the child. They have provided for the child since placement, have no criminal record, and have fulfilled all statutory requirements. They seek to adopt the child and have her recognized as their daughter, with legal guardians appointed in case of their incapacity or death.
Respondent
There was no formal respondent; however, the Department of Children Services and the guardian ad litem supported the application, confirming the applicants' suitability and the child's best interests being served by the adoption.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Section 4(2) of the Children Act, 2001

    The best interests of the child are paramount in adoption proceedings.

  2. 02

    Children Act, 2001

    Applicants must fulfill all legal requirements for adoption, including suitability, capacity, and proper procedure.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The court found that the applicants had fulfilled all legal requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001. The applicants demonstrated financial stability, emotional and physical fitness, and the ability to provide for the child. Reports from the Department of Children Services and the guardian ad litem confirmed the child had bonded well with the applicants and that the adoption was in her best interests. The child was abandoned, declared free for adoption, and placed with the applicants for a sufficient period. The court concluded that granting the adoption would serve the child's welfare and best interests, and thus allowed the application, changing the child's name and appointing legal guardians.

Obiter and limits

  • The child is entitled to all rights accruing to Kenyan citizens under the Constitution and the Kenya Citizenship and Immigration Act.
  • The court hereby discharges the guardian ad litem.

Court disposition

application for adoption allowed

  • The applicants S N M and A N N are authorized to adopt Baby N aka A W N.
  • The child shall henceforth be called A W N.
  • B N W and J K W are appointed legal guardians in the event of death or incapacity of the applicants before the child is of full age.
  • The Registrar General is directed to enter this order in the adoption register.
  • The guardian ad litem is discharged.

Source and reliance status

High Court

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

High Court

Judgment

[2017] KEHC 1015 (KLR)

REPUBLIC OF KENYA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI

ADOPTION CAUSE NO.173 OF 2015

IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN ACT NUMBER 8 OF 2001

AND

IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR ADOPTION OF BABY N aka N W N

S N M ..………………..………..……1ST APPLICANT

AND

A N N ………………………….……….2ND APLICANT

JUDGMENT

1. The applicants S N MandA N Nare seeking to be authorized to adopt Baby Aa.k.a A W Nhereinafter referred to as the child. They also seek that upon making the adoption the child be called A W N. They also seek thatB N WandJ K Wbe appointed the legal Guardian of the child in the event of death or incapacity of the applicants before he is of full age.

2. The applicants are both Kenyans born in 1970 and 1971 respectively. The applicants solemnized their marriage on 8th January 2010. The applicants are both [particulars withheld] and business people with their [particulars withheld] shop in Ruiru town. Both of them are in good health and Kenyan residents since birth. They are both physically and emotionally fit to parent a child. They have not been charged or convicted with any criminal offence referred to in the Third Schedule of the Children’s Act. They are financially capable of catering to a child’s needs.

3. The child was found abandoned on 24/11/2011 and she was rescued by a good Samaritan Shelmith Githui who reported the matter to Huruma police Station vide O. B. no. 37/28/11/2011. A vacancy was secured for her at Missionaries Charity Home on 24/11/2011. The police in their final letter dated 12/06/2011 indicated that their investigation had not borne any fruits. The child was committed to the Missionaries of Charity Home on 27/02/2012 vide care and protection number 37/2012 by Senior Magistrate’s Court at Nairobi the baby having not been claimed for a period of more than 6 months was declared free for adoption by KKPI Adoption Society on 27th June 2012 and issued with a certificate declaring a child for adoption no.

219. The child was placed with the applicants on 5th July 2012 and has been under their care since then.

4. The Department of Children Services filed their report on 25th May 2017. The officer observed that the applicants since taking up the child have been providing for the child effectively. They are responsible mature, emotionally and financially capable of providing for the child. The child has bonded well with applicants. The report recommends the local adoption as the applicants have fulfilled the legal requirements as provided under the Children’s Act. The applicants are capable of taking on parental responsibility as they are socially fit and are financially capable to provide for the needs of the child the report recommends that the adoption is in the child’s best interest.

5. The guardian ad litem report was filed on 6th September 2017. The guardian ad litem observed that the child is comfortable and happy with the adoptive parents. The child has bonded well with the child. The adoptive parents are of good character and can take care of the needs of the child. She observed that the adoptive are perfectly capable of raising the child and recommends the adoption.

6. It is evident that the applicants have fulfilled all the legal requirements relating to the adoption of the child. This court is satisfied that the applicants are qualified and able to take care of the child. They are financially stable and capable to provide for the upkeep and education of the child. It was evident that in the period that the applicants have had the custody of the child, the child bonded well with her.

7. This court finds that it would be in the best interest of the child to be adopted by the applicants. I allow the application for adoption. The applicants S N MandA N Nare hereby allowed to adopt Baby Aa.k.a. A W N. She shall henceforth be called A W N. B N W and J K W shall be the child’s Legal Guardian in the event of death or incapacity of the applicants before he is of full age. I direct the Registrar General to enter this order in the adoption register. The child was born in Kenya and is therefore a Kenyan by birth and is entitled all the rights that accrue to Kenyan citizens under the Kenya Constitution 2010 and the Kenya citizenship and Immigration Act. I hereby discharge the Guardian ad litem. It is so ordered.

Dated, signed and delivered this14thDay of December2017.

R. E. OUGO

JUDGE

In the presence of:

Mr. Kimathi h/b for Mr. Gatumuta For the Applicants

M/s Charity the Court Clerk

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Children Act, No. 8 of 2001

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Kenya Constitution 2010

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Kenya Citizenship and Immigration Act

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.