[2013] KEHC 1943 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants, having had continuous custody of the child since infancy and having fulfilled all statutory requirements, were suitable adoptive parents. The reports from the Adoption Society, the Director of Children’s Services, and the guardian ad litem were all favorable, confirming the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 1943 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: B W K; Applicant: B N N; Respondent: F K
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 115 of 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- adoption granted
- Judges
- LK Kimaru
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Within Family, Best Interest of Child, Dispensation of Parental Consent
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
B W K
Applicant
B N N
Applicant
F K
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have met the legal requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001.
- 2 Whether it is in the best interest of the child to be adopted by the applicants.
- 3 Whether the consent of the biological parents can be dispensed with due to their demise.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants, having had continuous custody of the child since infancy and having fulfilled all statutory requirements, were suitable adoptive parents. The reports from the Adoption Society, the Director of Children’s Services, and the guardian ad litem were all favorable, confirming the applicants' ability to provide for the child’s welfare and their financial capability. The consent of the biological parents was lawfully dispensed with as both were deceased. The court determined that the adoption was in the best interest of the child, who had bonded with the applicants and was accepted by their biological children as a sibling. Accordingly, the court allowed the...
Court Disposition
adoption granted
Orders
- The applicants, B W K and B N N, are allowed to adopt Baby R S N.
- The child shall henceforth be known as R N K.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
15 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
ADOPTION CAUSE NO.115 OF 2011
IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN ACT, 2001
AND
IN THE MATTER OF BABY R S N (MINOR)
B W K.……………………......…………………………1ST APPLICANT
B N N……………..………………………………………….2ND APPLICANT
J U D G M E N T
The applicants, B W K and B N N, are husband and wife. They were married in 1995 under Luhya Customary Law. The 1st applicant is a Diplomat employed by the Ministry of Home Affairs while the 2nd applicant is a banker. The Applicants have been blessed with three (3) biological children of their own aged respectively 17, 14 and 4 years. They have applied to this court to be allowed to adopt baby R S N (the child). The child was born on 20th October 2003. She is the daughter of H N K, the deceased male applicant’s sister. The mother of the child died two months after the birth of the child. She was taken in by the applicants when she was about one year old. Since then, the applicants have had continuous custody of the child. This is therefore an adoption within the family.
Prior to the hearing of the adoption, the Adoption Society, Little Angels Network, prepared a report which is filed in court. They also issued a certificate declaring the child free for adoption. The certificate is dated 1st September 2010. The Director of Children’s Services also prepared a report which is on record. The guardian ad litem, F K, prepared a report which has been filed in court. All the reports are favourable and recommend that the court allows the applicants to adopt the child. I have evaluated the facts of this adoption. This is a local adoption. It is also an adoption within the family. It is evident that the applicants have fulfilled all the legal requirements relating to the adoption of the child. The consent of the biological parents of the child was dispensed with since both biological parents are deceased. This court is satisfied that the applicants are qualified and able to take care of the child. The home visits by the guardian ad litem, the Adoption Society and the Director of the Children Services established that the applicants have the financial capability to provide for the upkeep and education of the child. This court observed that the applicants with the child in court. It was evident that in the period that the applicants have had the custody of the child, the child has bonded well with them. The child considers the applicants her parents. The biological children of the applicants have accepted the child as their sibling.
This court formed the opinion that it would be in the best interest of the child to be adopted by the applicants. I allow the applicants’ application for adoption. The applicants, B W K and B N N, are hereby allowed to adopt Baby R S N. Henceforth the child shall be known as R N K. F K, the brother of the 1st applicant shall be the legal guardian of the child should such eventuality arise. I direct the Registrar General to enter this order in the adoption register. I hereby discharge the guardian ad litem. It is so ordered.
DATED AT NAIROBI THIS 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2013
L. KIMARU
JUDGE