[2016] KEHC 3918 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had satisfied all legal requirements for a local adoption under the Children Act, Cap 141, Laws of Kenya. Despite the procedural anomaly of the applicant taking custody of the child before the child was formally freed for adoption, the court determined that the best interests of...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 3918 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: E W M; Respondent: Baby V M also known as P J W
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 175 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Adoption granted.
- Judges
- DN Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Procedure, Child Welfare, Parental Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
E W M
Applicant
Baby V M also known as P J W
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant meets the legal requirements for adoption under the Children Act.
- 2 Whether it is in the best interests of the child to be adopted by the applicant.
- 3 Whether the adoption should be allowed despite the applicant taking custody before the child was freed for adoption.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had satisfied all legal requirements for a local adoption under the Children Act, Cap 141, Laws of Kenya. Despite the procedural anomaly of the applicant taking custody of the child before the child was formally freed for adoption, the court determined that the best interests of the child would be served by allowing the adoption. The applicant was found to have the financial and emotional capacity to care for the child, and the child had bonded with her and considered her as her mother. All relevant reports from statutory bodies and the guardian ad litem were favourable. The court concluded that it would be in the best interests of the child to grant the...
Court Disposition
Adoption granted.
Orders
- The applicant, E W M, is allowed to adopt the child Baby V M also known as P J W, who shall hereafter be known as P J W.
- It is presumed that the child is Kenyan by birth and was born on 14th February 2011.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
(FAMILY DIVISION)
ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 175 OF 2013
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR ADOPTION OF BABY V M also known as P J W
JUDGEMENT
1. The applicant, E W M, is a Kenyan citizen. She is a widow. She seeks to adopt Baby V M also known as P J W. Her originating summons is dated 25th July 2013.
2. The child in question was found abandoned within Kitui County on 14th February 2011. The matter was reported the same day at the Kyuso Police Station. The child was briefly held at the Kyuso District Hospital where she received care and treatment. She was then admitted at the AIC Kitui Children’s Home, for care and protection. She was eventually formally committed to that institution by the Kitui Children’s Court. The police were unable to trace her biological parents or other relatives. She is estimated to have been born on 14th February 2011.
3. The child was freed for adoption by the Child Welfare Society of Kenya adoption society by their certificate number [particulars withheld] of 13th December 2012. The child was placed with the applicant on 14th November 2011.
4. To facilitate this adoption, the applicants have been assessed by the Child Welfare Society of Kenya, the Director of Children Services and the guardian ad litem, E N M. The three have compiled and filed their reports in court. That of the Director of Children Services is dated 25th February 2016, while that of the guardian ad litemis dated 21st March 2014. The report by the Child Welfare Society of Kenya is dated 13th December 2012.
5. All these reports are favourable and recommend the proposed adoption. The applicant has demonstrated that she has the financial and emotional capability and capacity to take care of the child. The child herself appears to have bonded well with her and she considers her to be her mother. I have taken note of the fact that the applicant is in the process of adopting another child.
6. In the opinion of this court it would be in the best interests of the child that she is adopted by the applicant. The applicant will be able to provide a home and a family for the child to grow up in and thereafter be a useful member of the family. Consequently, the applicant shall assume all parental rights and duties of the biological parent in respect of the adopted child; she shall treat the adopted child as if she was born to her. The applicant has been made aware that once the adoption order is made it shall be final and binding during the lifetime of the child and that the child shall have the right to inherit her property. The applicant cannot give up the child owing to any subsequent unforeseen behaviour or other changes in the child.
7. I have taken note of the fact that the applicant took custody of the child before she had been freed for adoption. This is contrary to the very clear provisions of the Children Act, Cap 141, Laws of Kenya, on adoption. I have however taken cognisance of the fact that the child has bonded well with the applicant and considers her to be her mother. I have also noted that the applicant has been assessed and found suitable to adopt. It would be in the interests of the child to allow the adoption despite that anomaly.
8. I am satisfied that all the legal requirements for a local adoption have been met, and I therefore make the following orders:-
(a) That the applicant, E W M, is hereby allowed to adopt the child Baby V M also known as P J W, who shall hereafter be known P J W;
(b) That it shall be presumed that the said child is Kenyan by birth and it shall be presumed that she was born on 14th February 2011.
(c) That L W M is hereby appointed legal guardian of the child in the event something untoward happens to the applicant;
(d) That the Registrar-General is hereby directed to enter this adoption order in the adoption register; and
(e) That the guardian ad litemis hereby discharged.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 22ND DAY OF JULY, 2016.
W. MUSYOKA
JUDGE