[2019] KEHC 9792 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had demonstrated consistent care and support for the child over an extended period, that the child had been declared free for adoption, and that all statutory requirements under the Children Act had been met. The reports from the Guardian ad Litem and the Children’s Officer...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 9792 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: LKL; Applicant: JCL
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kericho
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 4 of 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- adoption granted
- Judges
- EM Ngugi
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Procedure, Best Interests of Child, Guardianship, Child Abandonment
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LKL
Applicant
JCL
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants should be authorized to adopt the child BG.
- 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child as required by law.
- 3 Whether the applicants are fit and proper persons to be entrusted with the care of the child.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had demonstrated consistent care and support for the child over an extended period, that the child had been declared free for adoption, and that all statutory requirements under the Children Act had been met. The reports from the Guardian ad Litem and the Children’s Officer confirmed the applicants' suitability and the positive environment provided for the child. The court concluded that authorizing the adoption would serve the best interests of the child, providing him with a stable family and legal security.
Court Disposition
adoption granted
Orders
- The applicants are authorized to adopt the child currently identified as BG, who shall be renamed BK.
- The child is declared a citizen of Kenya with date of birth 16th February 2008.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT KERICHO
ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 4 OF 2012
IN THE MATTER OF CHILDREN ACT 2001 (ACT 8 OF 2001)
AND
IN THE MATTER OF BG (CHILD)
LKL.....................................................................1ST APPLICANT
JCL......................................................................2ND APPLICANT
JUDGMENT
1. By their Amended Originating Summons dated 1st March 2018, the applicants, LKL and JCL seek to be authorized to adopt the male child currently identified and known as BG.
2. The applicants are husband and wife. They first married under Kipsigis Customary law in March 1993 before formalizing their marriage under the provisions of the Marriage Act (now repealed) at the District Commissioner’s Officer, Bomet on 21st May 2010. The 1st applicant was born in 1966 and is now 53 years old. The 2nd applicant was born in 1977 and is now aged 42 years. The 1st applicant is a businessman while the 2nd applicant is a farmer.
3. The child the subject of this application is BG, presumed born on 16th February 2008. He was found abandoned in Nakuru, and taken to the Nakuru Provincial General Hospital on 8th May 2009. The matter was reported at the Nakuru Police Station under OB No. [Particulars withheld]. He was released to a good Samaritan, one SK, on 11th June 2009 for temporary care, then on 12th February 2010 to Ian Castleman Orphanage, and thereafter on 16th February 2010 to the Africa Gospel Church Baby Care Centre in Ngata.
4. The child was committed to the care of the Africa Gospel Church Baby Care Centre by the Children’s Court, Nakuru, vide Protection and Care Case No. 176 of 2010. Attempts to trace his relatives proved futile as the police indicated in the letter from the Nakuru Police Station dated 25th August 2010. The child was declared free for adoption on 14th December 2010 by the Kenya Children’s Homes Adoption Society and a Freeing Certificate serial number [particulars withheld] issued in compliance with section 156 (1) of the Children Act. The child was placed with the applicants on 7th February 2011.
5. On 8th June 2018, this court appointed DKR as the Guardian ad Litem in respect of the child. The Director, Children Services, was directed to investigate and file a report on the fitness or otherwise of the applicants to adopt the child.
6. In a report dated 3rd December 2018, the Guardian ad Litem notes that the applicants are looking after the child very well, and he recommends that they be allowed to adopt him.
7. In his report dated 18th September 2018, the Children’s Officer, County Children’s Office, Bomet, notes that the applicants have bonded well with the child. He is now in class 3 at [particulars withheld] Primary School. He further notes that the applicants have a 3 ½ acre parcel of land in Bomet County. They live in a one bedroom house with an external kitchen, bathroom and pit latrine. They practice farming on the land and keep dairy cows. The Children Officer recommended that the applicants be authorized to adopt the child.
8. I have considered the application and the affidavits in support. I note that the applicants have had custody of the child for the last 8 years. It seems to have taken them rather long to follow through on the adoption process which commenced in 2012.
9. Nonetheless, having considered the documents and affidavits placed before me, I find that it is in the ‘best interests of the child for the applicants to be allowed to adopt him. Though of modest means, they have their own home and an income from the 1st appellant’s business with which they have been able to support the child.
10. I accordingly hereby authorize the applicants to adopt the child currently identified and known as BG. The child shall be renamed BK and his date of birth shall be 16th February 2008. The child is declared a citizen of Kenya.
11. I direct the Registrar General to make the appropriate entry in the Adopted Children’s Register and the Registrar of Births to issue a birth certificate in respect of the child.
12. I appoint the 1st applicant’s brother, Gilbert Langat, to be the legal guardian of the child should any misfortune befall the applicants.
13. The Guardian ad Litem is hereby discharged.
14. Orders accordingly.
Dated Delivered and Signed at Kericho this 27th day of February 2019
MUMBI NGUGI
JUDGE