[2020] KEHC 2946 (KLR)
The court found that Baby BR (now known as BCP) was abandoned in Kenya as an infant, adopted by the applicant, and issued with a Kenyan passport at age 7. Under Article 14(4) of the Constitution, such a child is presumed to be a Kenyan citizen by birth. The court further held that the best interests of the child, as...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] KEHC 2946 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: LAP; Respondent: Director of Immigration
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Eldoret
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 1 of 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Ruling on Chamber Summons for Presumption of Citizenship
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- OA Sewe
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Orders, Presumption of Citizenship, Child Welfare, Passport Issuance
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LAP
Applicant
Director of Immigration
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Ruling on Chamber Summons for Presumption of Citizenship
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Baby BR (now known as BCP) is entitled to be presumed a Kenyan citizen by birth under Article 14(4) of the Constitution.
- 2 Whether the Director of Immigration should be ordered to issue a new generation Kenyan passport to the child.
- 3 Whether granting the orders sought is in the best interests of the child.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that Baby BR (now known as BCP) was abandoned in Kenya as an infant, adopted by the applicant, and issued with a Kenyan passport at age 7. Under Article 14(4) of the Constitution, such a child is presumed to be a Kenyan citizen by birth. The court further held that the best interests of the child, as mandated by the Children Act, require that she be accorded all rights of citizenship, including the issuance of a new generation passport. The Director of Immigration's insistence on a court order was satisfied by this ruling, and the application was allowed in full.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- A declaration that Baby BR (now known as BCP) is a Kenyan citizen by birth.
- The Director of Immigration is authorized to issue the child with a new generation Kenyan passport.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
31 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT ELDORET
ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 1 OF 2005
IN THE MATTER OF BABY BR ALIAS E (NOW KNOWN AS BCP
AND
IN THE MATTER OF ARTICLE 14(4) OF THE CONSTITUTION
AND
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR PRESUMPTION OF CITIZENSHIP
BY LAP IN RESPECT OF BABY BR ALIAS E(NOW KNOWN AS BCP)
RULING
[1]The Chamber Summons dated 22 August 2019 was filed by LAPunder Article 14(4) of the Constitution and Section 4(2) and (3) and Section 5 of the Children Act, No. 8 of 2001, for orders that Baby BR (now known as BCP), the child the subject of this adoption cause, be presumed to be a Kenyan citizen by birth; and that the Director of Immigration be authorized to issue the child with a Kenyan passport. It was also prayed that the Court be pleased to make any further orders it deems necessary in the circumstances.
[2]The application was premised on the affidavit of the applicant annexed thereto in which she deposed that the child was born and abandoned soon after birth in Eldoret Town; and that an Order for her adoption was made and issued herein on 13 April 2006. Thereafter, the child was issued with a Kenyan Passport No. [….] which the Immigration Department has declined to replace with the new generation type passport; insisting that it required an order of the Court declaring the child a Kenyan citizen by birth. Attached to the Supporting Affidavit are copies of the Adoption Order and Adoption Certificate, as well as a copy of the child’s current passport.
[3] Article 14(4) of the Constitution, upon which the instant application is predicated, provides that:
“A child found in Kenya who is, or appears to be, less than eight years of age, and whose nationality and parents are not known, is presumed to be a citizen by birth.”
[4] On the other hand, Section 4 of the Children Act,provides that:
(1) Every child shall have an inherent right to life and it shall be the responsibility of the Government and the family to ensure the survival and development of the child.
(2) In all actions concerning children, whether undertaken by public or private social welfare institutions, courts of law, administrative authorities, or legislative bodies, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration.
(3) All judicial and administrative institutions, and all persons acting in the name of these institutions, where they are exercising any powers conferred by this Act shall treat the interests of the child as the first and paramount consideration to the extent that this is consistent with adopting a course of action calculated to—
(a) safeguard and promote the rights and welfare of the child;
(b) conserve and promote the welfare of the child;
(c) Secure for the child such guidance and correction as is necessary for the welfare of the child and in the public interest.
(4) In any matters of procedure affecting a child, the child shall be accorded an opportunity to express his opinion, and that opinion shall be taken into account as may be appropriate taking into account the child’s age and degree of maturity.
[5] It is indubitable that the child, the subject of these proceedings was adopted by the applicant pursuant to a Court Order issued herein on 13 April 2006. She was thereafter issued with a Kenyan Passport No. […..]on 30 June 2011 which has an expiry date of 28 June 2021. When she was issued with the said passport, she was 7 years old; and therefore entitled to the presumption of citizenship for purposes of Article 14(4)of the Constitution. There is therefore no question that the child is entitled to the rights set out in Section 22 of the Kenya Citizenship and Immigration Act, No. 12 of 2011; and in particular, to the documents set out in Section 22(g) of the Act, including the new generation passport.
[6] Thus, there is abundant proof not only that the applicant is entitled to the orders sought; but also that it is in the best interest of the subject child for the orders prayed for to be granted. In the premises, the application dated 22 August 2019 is hereby allowed and orders granted as hereunder:
[a] A declaration that Baby BR (now known as BCP), the child the subject of this adoption cause, is a Kenyan citizen by birth;
[b] That the Director of Immigration be and is hereby authorized to issue the child with a new generation Kenyan passport.
It is so ordered.
DATED SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIA EMAIL AT ELDORET THIS 12TH DAY OF AUGUST 2020
OLGA SEWE
JUDGE