[2018] KEHC 4994 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant, being the aunt of the minors, is best placed to provide care and custody for the children given the incapacity of the biological mother, who is undergoing rehabilitation and unable to care for them, and the abdication of responsibility by the biological father. The application was...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 4994 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: J I M W; Respondent: J K G
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application 108 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Urgent Application for Guardianship
- Outcome
- application granted
- Judges
- LA Achode
- Legal Topics
- Guardianship of Minors, Best Interests of Child, Parental Responsibility, Child Custody
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
J I M W
Applicant
J K G
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Urgent Application for Guardianship
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be appointed as guardian/legal representative of the minors pending their mother’s treatment.
- 2 Whether the best interests of the children require granting custody to the applicant in the absence of both biological parents.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant, being the aunt of the minors, is best placed to provide care and custody for the children given the incapacity of the biological mother, who is undergoing rehabilitation and unable to care for them, and the abdication of responsibility by the biological father. The application was uncontested, and the evidence demonstrated that the welfare and best interests of the children would be served by granting the applicant guardianship and custody. The court emphasized that the best interests of the child are paramount, as enshrined in Article 53(2) of the Constitution and Section 4(3) of the Children Act. The urgency of the situation, with the children facing...
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- The applicant is appointed as the guardian/legal representative of the minors B W K and D G K.
- The applicant is authorized to take the minors into her custody and care and to provide for their basic needs pending their mother’s treatment and release.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 108 OF 2018
IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN’S ACT CAP 248
AND
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF MINORS B W K AND D G K
J I M W...................APPLICANT
VERSUS
J K G................RESPONDENT
RULING
1. The Applicant, J I M W has brought an application under Certificate of Urgency. By way of Notice of Motion dated 30th July, 2018 under sections 13, 79, 82and105of the Children’s Act. The application seeks for orders that the Applicant be appointed as the Guardian/Legal Representative of the minor children B W K and D G K, to take them into her custody and care and to provide for their basic needs pending their mother’s treatment and release from the [particulars withheld] centre.
2. The application is premised on the grounds that the Applicant is an aunt to the minors who are aged 13 and 10 years respectively. The Applicant had admitted the children to a boarding school and unless the orders are granted, the children would be stranded once the schools close on 3rd August, 2018 since both of their biological parents are unable to look after them.
3. The application is supported by the Applicant’s affidavit sworn on 30th July, 2018. In the affidavit, the Applicant avers that the biological mother of the two minors is currently under the care of the Retreat Rehabilitation Centre – [particulars withheld], where she was admitted on 26th July, 2018 for 90 days. She is suffering from alcohol abuse and due to her medical condition, she is under 24 hour nursing care and is unable to take care of the minors who are in school.
4. In the supporting affidavit, the Applicant also deposes that the biological mother cannot currently manage her own affairs, or make decisions regarding the children hence the application. The biological parents of the minors are said to be divorced and their father has given up parental responsibility towards the children.
5. Learned Counsel Mr. Museve appearing for the Applicant submitted that the father of the minors filed a Children’s matter in Court soon after the divorce. He however withdrew the matter by a letter dated 9th January, 2012 through his lawyer and since then he has neither visited nor maintained the minors in any way howsoever. Counsel further submitted that this Certificate had been served upon the biological father who declined service. I note from the record that the affidavit of service indicates that he was served personally but that he refused to sign the return of service.
6. The urgency of the matter comes about from the fact that the two minors are in a boarding school and are due to close school tomorrow, the 3rd of July, 2018. The minors will not be released to a person other than their mother who is the care giver registered with the school, but who is now admitted at the Rehabilitation centre.
7. Annexed to the supporting affidavit are the birth certificates of the minors and their proforma invoices for school fees from [particulars withheld] School. Also annexed are the Decree Nisi dated 22nd June, 2012 in the divorce matter and the father’s letter dated 9th January, 2012 addressed to the Executive Officer Children’s Court Milimani, in which he withdrew the Children’s case against their biological mother.
8. The foregoing being the matrix of this case, I bear in mind that the application is not contested and more importantly, that it concerns the well-being of children. In law, in any matter concerning a child, the best interests of a child are paramount. Article 53 (2) of the Constitutionprovides the guiding principle on this question as follows:
“A child’s best interests are of paramount importance in every matter concerning the child.”
The other pertinent law on the best interest of a child is the Children Act No. 8 of 2001 and in particular Section 4(3) thereof.
9. After careful consideration of the grounds of the application and all the attendant circumstances of the case, I am satisfied that the prayer sought in the application dated 30th July, 2018 is merited. Consequently, the application is granted with no orders as to costs.
SIGNED DATED and DELIVERED in open court this 2nd day of August 2018.
............................
L. A. ACHODE
JUDGE