[2025] KEHC 7287 (KLR)
The court found, based on uncontroverted medical evidence and the applicant's testimony, that CAA suffers from a mental disorder (neurocognitive disorder/dementia) and is incapable of managing her affairs. The statutory requirements under the Mental Health Act were satisfied. The court exercised its discretion to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 7287 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: NOO; Respondent: CAA
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Petition E010 of 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Petition allowed. NOO appointed as guardian and manager of CAA's estate. No order as to costs.
- Judges
- A Mabeya
- Legal Topics
- Mental Health Guardianship, Appointment of Manager, Incapacity Due to Illness
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NOO
Applicant
CAA
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether CAA is a person suffering from mental disorder within the meaning of the Mental Health Act.
- 2 Whether NOO should be appointed as guardian and manager of CAA's estate.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found, based on uncontroverted medical evidence and the applicant's testimony, that CAA suffers from a mental disorder (neurocognitive disorder/dementia) and is incapable of managing her affairs. The statutory requirements under the Mental Health Act were satisfied. The court exercised its discretion to appoint NOO as guardian and manager of CAA's estate, finding it fair and just in the circumstances. No contrary evidence was presented, and the application was unopposed. The orders sought were therefore granted as prayed.
Court Disposition
Petition allowed. NOO appointed as guardian and manager of CAA's estate. No order as to costs.
Orders
- CAA is declared a person suffering from mental disorder within the meaning of the Mental Health Act.
- NOO is appointed as guardian over the affairs of CAA.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
In re CAA (A Person Sufferring from Mental Disorder) (Petition E010 of 2025) [2025] KEHC 7287 (KLR) (30 May 2025) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 7287 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kisumu
Petition E010 of 2025
A Mabeya, J
May 30, 2025
IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION BY NOO TO BE APPOINTED GUARDIAN OVER THE AFFAIRS OF CAA AND ADMINISTRATOR OF HER ESTATE IN THE MATTER OF GUARDIANSHIP OF SUBJECT – CAA
In the matter of
NOO
Petitioner
Judgment
1. CAA (‘the Subject’) aged 64 years is the wife of NOO (‘the Petitioner’). On 4/9/1999, the Subject was married to the petitioner and they have lived together since then.
2. However, on 2/9/2020, the Subject suffered psychosis, hypertension and cerebral vascular accident (stroke). It physically and mentally affected her. She was admitted to the Vihiga County Referral Hospital for 21 days. A Mental Assessment Report dated 21/5/2025 from Kisumu County Referral Hospital show that the Subject has poor judgment, impaired memory, lacks attention and concentration. The said report concludes that she suffers from Neurocognitive Disorder (Dementia).
3. On 9/5/2025, the Petitioner took out a Petition under sections 26 and 27 of the Mental Health Act and sought that the Subject be declared a person suffering from mental disorder. He also sought to be appointed as the Guardian of the Subject and therefore her Manager.
4. On 27/5/2025, he appeared in Court and testified on oath. He confirmed the contents of his Petition as narrated above. He produced medical records from Vihiga Referral Hospital Report and the aforesaid Medical Report in support of his contestations.
5. The Court has carefully considered the statements in the Petition. It has also considered the testimony of the Petitioner as corroborated by the documentary evidence that she produced.
6. Section 2 of the Mental Health Act, Cap 248 defines a person suffering from mental disorders as: -“… a person who has been found to be suffering under this Act and includes a person diagonized as a psychopathic person with mental illness and person suffering from mental impairment due to alcohol or substance abuse.”
7. Section 26 of the said Act provides for the orders that this Court can make upon being satisfied that a person is suffering from mental disorder. It provides for the management of his estate and guardianship. Sub-section 3 thereof provides: -“Whereupon inquiry it is found that the person to whom the inquiry relates is suffering from mental disorder to such an extent as to be incapable of managing his affairs, but that he is capable of managing himself and is not dangerous to himself or to others or likely to act in a manner offensive to public decency, the Court may make such orders as it may think fit for the management of the estate of such person, including proper provision for his maintenance and for the maintenance of such members of his family as are dependent upon him for maintenance, but need not, in such case, make any order as to the custody of the person suffering from mental disorder.”
8. In the present case, I have considered the Mental Assessment Report dated 21/5/2025. I have also considered the testimony of the Petitioner. I am satisfied that the Subject suffers from mental disorder. That it is fair and just that his affairs be managed by a Guardian.
9. Accordingly, I allow the Petition and grant prayer Nos. 1 to 3 thereof. No order as to costs.It is so decreed.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 30TH DAY OF MAY, 2025. A. MABEYA, FCI ArbJUDGE