[2021] KEHC 7565 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants, a married couple who have cared for the abandoned child since 2015, are suitable adoptive parents. The child was declared free for adoption by the Child Welfare Society of Kenya, and both the Guardian Ad Litem and the Director of Children Services recommended the adoption. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 7565 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: BSN; Applicant: SWM; Respondent: MM
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Makueni
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 1 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Application / Ruling
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- GMA Dulu
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Procedure, Best Interests of Child, Abandoned Children
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
BSN
Applicant
SWM
Applicant
MM
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Adoption Application / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants should be authorized to adopt the child CM.
- 2 Whether the consent of the biological parents should be dispensed with due to abandonment.
- 3 Whether the child should be presumed a Kenyan citizen and issued a passport.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants, a married couple who have cared for the abandoned child since 2015, are suitable adoptive parents. The child was declared free for adoption by the Child Welfare Society of Kenya, and both the Guardian Ad Litem and the Director of Children Services recommended the adoption. The court determined that the adoption would serve the best interests of the child, providing him with a stable family environment. The consent of the biological parents was dispensed with due to abandonment. The court further ordered that the child be presumed a Kenyan citizen and be issued a passport, and appointed MM as the legal guardian. The orders sought were granted in full,...
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The applicants are authorized to adopt the child CM.
- The consent of the biological parents is dispensed with as the child was abandoned.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
34 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MAKUENI
HIGH COURT ADOPTION CASE NO. 1 OF 2020
IN THE MATTER OF..............................................THE CHILDREN ACT
AND
IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF.............................BABY CM
BY
BSN................................................................1ST APPLICANT
SWM............................................................ 2ND APPLICANT
RULING
1. Before me is an Originating Summons filed on 22nd February 2016 under section 4 and 154 of the Children Act 2001, section 9 of the Kenya Citizenship and Immigration Act No. 12 of 2011 and Article 14 of the Constitution of Kenya 2010 seeking the following orders –
1) That the Applicants be authorized to adopt the child CM.
2) That the consent of the biological parents be dispensed with as the child was abandoned.
3) That upon making of the adoption order, the said child be known as JMS.
4) That the Registrar General do make the appropriate entry of JMS in the Adopted Children’s Register.
5) That the child JMS be presumed to be a Kenyan citizen born in Kenya and that the Director of Immigration Services do issue JMS with a Kenyan passport.
6) MM be appointed Legal Guardian of the child JMS.
2. The application was filed with a statement of the Applicants as well as a supporting affidavit.
3. Before this application was heard, this court through a Chamber Summons filed with the Originating Summons, appointed MM as Guardian Ad Litem of the child, and ordered the Director of Children Services to file a report or the suitability of the Applicants to adopt the child.
4. Following the above court orders the Director of Children Services filed their report on 20th October 2020 signed by Rasto Omolo – Sub-county Children Officer – Makueni county, while the Guardian Ad Litem MM filed her report on 6th January 2021. Both reports were adopted in court by their makers; and both recommend the request for adoption of the child favourably. When the matter came up in court before me, this court had the opportunity to see the applicants and the child.
5. I have considered the application, documents filed and the evidence tendered before me. I note that the child is an abandoned child and was declared free for adoption by the Child Welfare Society of Kenya.
6. I also note that the Applicants are a husband and wife, both teachers employed by the Teachers Service Commission and the child has been in their custody since 2015, and the child is currently schooling at Joy Sounds Academy. In my view, the child and the applicants have bonded well.
7. Under Articles 53(2) of the Constitution of Kenya 2010, courts are obligated to take the best interests of the child to be of paramount consideration, in any matter involving a child.
8. From the facts and evidence placed before me herein, I am of the view that allowing this application for adoption will be in the best interests of this otherwise abandoned child, as the child will be able to grow up in a family, with parents who will take care, support and guide him. I thus allow the application and order as follows:-
1) The Applicants herein are authorized to adopt the child CM.
2) The consent of the biological parents be and is hereby dispensed with as the child was abandoned.
3) The child CM upon this adoption order is henceforth known as JMS.
4) I order that the Registrar General do make the appropriate entry of JMS in the Adopted Children’s Register.
5) The child JMS be and is hereby presumed to be a Kenyan citizen born in Kenya and the Director of Immigration Services should issue JMS with a Kenyan passport.
6) MM be and is hereby appointed Legal Guardian of the child JMS.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MAKUENI IN OPEN COURT THIS 27TH DAY OF APRIL 2021.
...............................
GEORGE DULU
JUDGE