[2018] KEHC 1891 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants, as grandparents and long-term primary caregivers of the minor C W, are best suited to act as her guardians following the death of her biological mother and the absence of a known biological father. The court applied the principle that the best interests of the child are...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 1891 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: E K - G; Applicant: R W K; Respondent: C W
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 170 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Legal Topics
- Guardianship of Minors, Best Interests of Child, Appointment of Guardians
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
E K - G
Applicant
R W K
Applicant
C W
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants should be appointed as guardians of the minor C W.
- 2 Whether the best interests of the child are served by granting guardianship to the applicants.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants, as grandparents and long-term primary caregivers of the minor C W, are best suited to act as her guardians following the death of her biological mother and the absence of a known biological father. The court applied the principle that the best interests of the child are paramount, as enshrined in Article 53(2) of the Constitution and the Children Act. The applicants demonstrated their ability and willingness to provide for the child’s welfare, and the child had clearly bonded with them. Therefore, the court concluded that appointing the applicants as joint guardians would serve the best interests of the child.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The subject person is declared to be a minor and requires a guardian.
- The applicants, E K – G and R W K, are authorized to act as guardians of the subject child C W.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
29 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 170 OF 2018 (O.S)
IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN’S ACT NO. 8 OF 2001
IN THE MATTER OF ADOPTION OF BABY C W
BY
E K - G AND R W K (APPLICANTS)
JUDGMENT
1. The Applicants E K - G and R W K are in a monogamous marriage. The biological parent (mother) of the minor herein passed away on 30th November, 2017 being a single parent. They wish to be granted guardianship of the female child known as C W, through the Originating Summons dated 12th November, 2018.
2. Records indicate that the minor in this matter is a grand-daughter to the applicants. Her mother C G K (deceased) was a daughter to the Applicants. There is a Death Certificate No. [Particulars Withheld] dated 13th December, 2017 on the record in this regard. The child was born on 25th June, 2002 at Kaloleni Hospital, Nairobi.
3. The child, C W, has been living with the Applicants at their residence at Nairobi which she did even during her mother’s lifetime. The Applicants have all along been providing for the basic needs of the child including medical care, food, shelter, clothing and education. They have therefore been the minor’s primary care givers.
4. The child was in court during the hearing and appeared to have bonded well with the Applicants. She was jovial and clearly seemed to trust the Applicants.
5. Under section 105 of the Children Act No. 8 Cap 141 Laws of Kenya the court may appoint a guardian in the following circumstances:
a. On the application of any individual, where the child’s parents are no longer living, or cannot be found and the child has no guardian and no other person having parental responsibility for him;
b. On the application of any individual, where the child is a displaced child within the meaning of section 119 of this Act.
Appointment of the Applicants as guardians of the minor means that they shall assume parental responsibility for this child whose biological mother is dead and the biological father is unknown.
6. The orders sought by the Applicants relate to a child. In law, in any matter concerning a child, the best interests of a child are paramount. Article 53(2) of theConstitution provides the guiding principle on this question as follows:
“A child’s best interests are of paramount importance in every matter concerning the child.”
The other pertinent law is the Children Act No. 8 of 2001 and in particular Section 4(3) thereof amplifies this principle.
7. I note that the child herein, whose biological mother passed on, is a grandchild to the Applicants. In my opinion, they are best suited to continue taking care of this child, who has been used to them since birth. They have proved during the period prior to the demise of her biological mother that they are capable of taking on the challenge of caring for the child in this matter as indicated in the supporting affidavit.
8. From the foregoing, this court has formed the opinion that it is in the best interest of the child to be placed under the guardianship of the Applicants. Reason wherefore, I allow the prayers sought in the Originating Summons dated 12th November, 2018 and orders as follows:
i.The subject person herein be and is hereby declared to be a minor and requires a guardian.
ii.The Applicants, E K – G and R W K are hereby authorized to act as guardians of the subject child C W.
iii.The appointment confers the Applicants as joint guardians of the subject child.
It is so ordered.
SIGNED, DATED and DELIVERED in open court this 29th day of November, 2018.
...........................
L. A. ACHODE
HIGH COURT JUDGE