[2019] KEHC 10074 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 10074 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had addressed the concerns raised in the previous judgment by moving to a one-bedroom house, ensuring the child no longer shares a bed with her. The National Adoption Committee guidelines permit a sole female to adopt a male child if she is the only available adopter, which was the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 10074 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: EK
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Adoption Cause 82 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Application for Review of Judgment Declining Adoption
Outcome
application for review allowed; adoption order granted
Judges
AO Muchelule, A Ali-Aroni
Legal Topics
Adoption Orders, Special Circumstances, Best Interests of Child
Source Language
en
Family and Children Adoption Orders Special Circumstances Best Interests of Child

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

EK

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Adoption Cause / Application for Review of Judgment Declining Adoption

  1. 1 Whether the applicant demonstrated special circumstances to justify adoption of a male child by a single female applicant.
  2. 2 Whether the review of the previous judgment declining adoption is warranted based on new evidence and compliance with guidelines.
  3. 3 Whether granting the adoption is in the best interests of the child.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had addressed the concerns raised in the previous judgment by moving to a one-bedroom house, ensuring the child no longer shares a bed with her. The National Adoption Committee guidelines permit a sole female to adopt a male child if she is the only available adopter, which was the case here. The child had been abandoned and remained unclaimed for years, and the applicant was the only person willing to adopt him. The court determined that granting the adoption would be in the best interests of the child, satisfying both statutory and guideline requirements. Accordingly, the previous judgment was reviewed and set aside, and the adoption order was granted.

Court Disposition

application for review allowed; adoption order granted

Orders

  • The judgment dated 6th March 2018 declining adoption is reviewed and set aside.
  • The applicant EK is allowed to adopt the minor DB.