[2019] KEHC 8776 (KLR)

[2019] KEHC 8776 (KLR)

The court found that the Applicants had fulfilled all statutory requirements for local adoption under the Children Act, 2001. The child had been abandoned at infancy and no biological parent could be traced, justifying the dispensation of parental consent. Reports from the adoption society, guardian ad litem, and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2019] KEHC 8776 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: SK; Applicant: WG
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Commercial Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Adoption Cause 60 of 2017
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Outcome
adoption granted
Legal Topics
Adoption Procedure, Best Interests of Child, Parental Responsibility
Source Language
en
Family and Children Adoption Procedure Best Interests of Child Parental Responsibility

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

SK

Applicant

WG

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Adoption Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the Applicants have met the legal requirements for adoption under the Children Act, 2001.
  2. 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child as required by Article 53(2) of the Constitution and section 4(3) of the Children Act.
  3. 3 Whether the consent of the biological parents can be dispensed with due to abandonment.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Applicants had fulfilled all statutory requirements for local adoption under the Children Act, 2001. The child had been abandoned at infancy and no biological parent could be traced, justifying the dispensation of parental consent. Reports from the adoption society, guardian ad litem, and Department of Children Services confirmed the Applicants' suitability and the child's positive adjustment in their care. The court determined that the adoption was in the best interests of the child, as required by Article 53(2) of the Constitution and section 4(3) of the Children Act. The Applicants were therefore granted the adoption order, with the child to be known as DK, and...

Court Disposition

adoption granted

Orders

  • The Applicants, SK and WG, are allowed to adopt Baby DM, who shall henceforth be known as DK.
  • The child's date of birth is declared as 12th January, 2013, presumed born in Nairobi, Kenya.