[2016] KEHC 6525 (KLR)
The court found that the applicants had satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children.s Act. The child was abandoned, declared free for adoption, and placed with the applicants, who demonstrated the capacity to provide for his welfare. All assessment reports were favourable, indicating the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] KEHC 6525 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: P N M; Applicant: P M W; Respondent: Baby D M S also known as E
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 223 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- Adoption granted.
- Judges
- DN Musyoka
- Legal Topics
- Adoption Procedure, Child Welfare, Parental Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
P N M
Applicant
P M W
Applicant
Baby D M S also known as E
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have met the legal requirements for adoption under the Children.s Act.
- 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child.
- 3 Whether the applicants are suitable to assume parental rights and duties over the child.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children.s Act. The child was abandoned, declared free for adoption, and placed with the applicants, who demonstrated the capacity to provide for his welfare. All assessment reports were favourable, indicating the applicants' suitability and the child's best interests would be served by the adoption. The court concluded that granting the adoption would provide the child with a stable family environment and secure his welfare, and therefore allowed the adoption as prayed.
Court Disposition
Adoption granted.
Orders
- The applicants, P N M and P M W, are allowed to adopt the child Baby Dennis Muhoja Shisoya also known as E, who shall hereafter be known as H M N.
- The child is declared to be Kenyan by birth and presumed born on 15th August 2009.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MILIMANI
ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 223 OF 2013 (OS)
AND
IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN’S ACT
(NO. 8 OF 2001)
AND
IN THE MATTER OF BABY D M S also known as E
JUDGEMENT
1. The applicants, P N M and P M W, are Kenyan citizens. They are a married couple. They seek to adopt Baby D M S also known as E. Their originating summons is dated 25th September 2013.
2. The child in question was presented at the Pangani Police Station on 17th August 2011 as an abandoned child, having allegedly been found within the Mlango Kubwa area of Pangani, Nairobi. The child was then admitted at the Nairobi Children’s Home, from Nairobi Women’s Hospital. He was later transferred to His Cherished Ones Inc., Haven of Hope Baby Centre at Nakuru. He was eventually formally committed to that institution by the Nakuru Children’s Court. The police were unable to trace his biological parents.
3. The child was freed for adoption by the Kenya Children’s Homes adoption society by their certificate of 8th March 2011. The child was placed with the applicants on 26th March 2011.
4. To facilitate this adoption, the applicants have been assessed by the Kenya Children’s Homes, the Director of Children Services and the guardian ad litem, Mary Nyambura Kamuiru. The three have compiled and filed their reports in court. That of the Director of Children Services is dated 16th October 2014, while that of the guardian ad litemis dated 4th February 2014. The report by the Kenya Children’s Homes is dated 9th July 2013.
5. All these reports are favourable and recommend the proposed adoption. The applicants have demonstrated that they have the financial and emotional capability and capacity to take care of the child. The child himself appears to have bonded well with them and he considers them to be his parents. I have taken note of the fact that the applicants have one biological child of their own.
6. In the opinion of this court it would be in the best interests of the child that he is adopted by the applicants. The applicants will be able to provide a home and a family for the child to grow up in and thereafter be a useful member of the family. Consequently, the applicants shall assume all parental rights and duties of the biological parents in respect of the adopted child; they shall treat the adopted child as if he was born to them. The applicants have been made aware that once the adoption order is made it shall be final and binding during the lifetime of the child and that the child shall have the right to inherit their property. The applicant cannot give up the child owing to any subsequent unforeseen behaviour or other changes in the child.
7. I am satisfied that all the legal requirements for a local adoption have been met, and I therefore make the following orders:-
a. That the applicants, P N M and P M W, are hereby allowed to adopt the child Baby Dennis Muhoja Shisoya also known as E, who shall hereafter be known H M N;
b. That the said child is hereby declared to be Kenyan by birth and it shall be presumed that he was born on 15th August 2009.
c. That W M W and R W G are hereby appointed legal guardians of the child in the event something untoward happens to the applicants;
d. That the Registrar-General is hereby directed to enter this adoption order in the adoption register; and
e. That the guardian ad litemis hereby discharged.
DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at NAIROBI this 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2016.
W. MUSYOKA
JUDGE