[1987] KEHC 3 (KLR)

[1987] KEHC 3 (KLR)

The court found that, in the interests of justice and to ensure a fair determination for all parties, it was reasonable and meritorious to grant an adjournment of the winding up petition. The court considered the substantial interests of the Industrial Commercial Development Corporation as debenture holders and the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1987] KEHC 3 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Cambridge University Press; Respondent: East African Publishing House Ltd; Creditor: Industrial Commercial Development Corporation; Creditor: Proost Paper (E.A.) Ltd.; Creditor: General Printers Ltd.; Creditor: Wiggins Teaps (K) Ltd.; Creditor: Julia Kathuni Gitobu; Creditor: Bakul Kothari (Auditors and Accountants)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Winding Up Cause 34 of 1987
Procedural Posture
Winding Up Cause / Interlocutory Application for Adjournment Pending Filing of Statement of Affairs
Outcome
Adjournment granted; hearing of winding up petition stood over pending filing of Statement of Affairs by Receiver.
Judges
BA Mitullah
Legal Topics
Winding Up Petition, Company Insolvency, Creditor Rights, Debenture Holder Priority
Source Language
en
Commercial and Corporate Winding Up Petition Company Insolvency Creditor Rights Debenture Holder Priority

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cambridge University Press

Applicant

East African Publishing House Ltd

Respondent

Industrial Commercial Development Corporation

Creditor

Proost Paper (E.A.) Ltd.

Creditor

General Printers Ltd.

Creditor

Wiggins Teaps (K) Ltd.

Creditor

Julia Kathuni Gitobu

Creditor

Bakul Kothari (Auditors and Accountants)

Creditor

Procedural Posture

Winding Up Cause / Interlocutory Application for Adjournment Pending Filing of Statement of Affairs

  1. 1 Whether the court should grant an adjournment to allow the Receiver to file a Statement of Affairs before determining the winding up petition.
  2. 2 Whether the interests of justice and all parties require a delay in the hearing of the winding up petition.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that, in the interests of justice and to ensure a fair determination for all parties, it was reasonable and meritorious to grant an adjournment of the winding up petition. The court considered the substantial interests of the Industrial Commercial Development Corporation as debenture holders and the need for the Receiver to file a Statement of Affairs. The adjournment would assist the court in arriving at a just decision regarding the winding up. The court exercised its discretion to stand over the hearing of the petition and directed the Receiver to file the Statement of Affairs within 30 days. Costs for the adjournment were awarded to the petitioner, with other costs...

Court Disposition

Adjournment granted; hearing of winding up petition stood over pending filing of Statement of Affairs by Receiver.

Orders

  • The Receiver appointed is at liberty to file a Statement of Affairs within 30 days from the date of the ruling.
  • The hearing of the winding up petition is stood over until the Statement of Affairs is filed.