[1987] KEHC 3 (KLR)
The court found that, in the interests of justice and to ensure a fair determination for all parties, it was reasonable and meritorious to grant an adjournment of the winding up petition. The court considered the substantial interests of the Industrial Commercial Development Corporation as debenture holders and the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1987] KEHC 3 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Cambridge University Press; Respondent: East African Publishing House Ltd; Creditor: Industrial Commercial Development Corporation; Creditor: Proost Paper (E.A.) Ltd.; Creditor: General Printers Ltd.; Creditor: Wiggins Teaps (K) Ltd.; Creditor: Julia Kathuni Gitobu; Creditor: Bakul Kothari (Auditors and Accountants)
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Winding Up Cause 34 of 1987
- Procedural Posture
- Winding Up Cause / Interlocutory Application for Adjournment Pending Filing of Statement of Affairs
- Outcome
- Adjournment granted; hearing of winding up petition stood over pending filing of Statement of Affairs by Receiver.
- Judges
- BA Mitullah
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up Petition, Company Insolvency, Creditor Rights, Debenture Holder Priority
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cambridge University Press
Applicant
East African Publishing House Ltd
Respondent
Industrial Commercial Development Corporation
Creditor
Proost Paper (E.A.) Ltd.
Creditor
General Printers Ltd.
Creditor
Wiggins Teaps (K) Ltd.
Creditor
Julia Kathuni Gitobu
Creditor
Bakul Kothari (Auditors and Accountants)
Creditor
Procedural Posture
Winding Up Cause / Interlocutory Application for Adjournment Pending Filing of Statement of Affairs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court should grant an adjournment to allow the Receiver to file a Statement of Affairs before determining the winding up petition.
- 2 Whether the interests of justice and all parties require a delay in the hearing of the winding up petition.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, in the interests of justice and to ensure a fair determination for all parties, it was reasonable and meritorious to grant an adjournment of the winding up petition. The court considered the substantial interests of the Industrial Commercial Development Corporation as debenture holders and the need for the Receiver to file a Statement of Affairs. The adjournment would assist the court in arriving at a just decision regarding the winding up. The court exercised its discretion to stand over the hearing of the petition and directed the Receiver to file the Statement of Affairs within 30 days. Costs for the adjournment were awarded to the petitioner, with other costs...
Court Disposition
Adjournment granted; hearing of winding up petition stood over pending filing of Statement of Affairs by Receiver.
Orders
- The Receiver appointed is at liberty to file a Statement of Affairs within 30 days from the date of the ruling.
- The hearing of the winding up petition is stood over until the Statement of Affairs is filed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
36 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT NAIROBI (NAIROBI LAW COURTS)
WINDING UP CAUSE 34 OF 1987
IN THE MATTER OF EAST AFRICAN PUBLISHING HOUSE LTD
AND
IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT (CAP 486)
RULING
This winding up petition before the court is presented by Cambridge University Press, the applicant under the provisions of the Companies Act (Cap 486) Laws of Kenya
Petitioner in its petition submits that the Respondent East African Publishing House is indebted to the petitioner in the sum of shs. 1,188,698. 00 under the Artibration award made in H.C.C.C. No 448 of 1977 plus accrued interest at the rate of 8% per annum from the date. The said amount it is submitted was duly demanded from the respondent and it is in the circumstances deemed that the Respondent is unable to pay its debt under Sec. 220 of the Companies Act.
For this reason the petitioner prays that;
East African Publishing House Ltd., may be wound up by the court under provisions of the Companies Act or
That such other may be made in the premises as to the court shall seem just.
The petition for winding up is being supported by some of the creditors these are, briefly:
1. Proost Paper (E.A.) Ltd.
Creditors amount of debt is shs 337,000/-
2. General Printers Ltd.
Creditors amount of debt is shs. 121,944/20
3. Wiggins Teaps (k) Ltd.
Creditor amount in this respect is claimed to be shs. 235,005/00
Julia Kathuni Gitobu claims an unspecificed amount but at the hearing her advocates or record S.G. Mbaabu and Co., - were not present during the proceedings.
Miss Sally Githere appeared for Industrial Commercial Development Corporation. She opposes the winding up petition she submits that Industrial Commercial Development Corporation are owed a sum of shs. 4,033,405/90 plus a further substantial amount in accrued interest. The Industrial Commercial Development Corporation are the debenture Holders of the company and Miss Githere from the Dar informed the court that receivers have been appointed by her client together with another party.
Mr Bakul Kothari appeared for his firm of Auditors and Accountants for which he is the proprietor and opposed the winding up petition. His firm is owed a sum of shs 233,600/- for professional services rendered.
Miss Githere Counsel for Industrial Commercial Development Corporation during her submissions urged the court to grant her time so as to enable the Receiver to file a Statement of Affairs prior to the final determination of the petition.
This application is supported by Mr Kothari one of the Creditors.
Mr Beverell strongly opposed this application for the Petitioner and contends that the hearing of the petition be concluded and order as prayed be made.
He has cited to me Palmers Company Law Vol. 1 1982 ED in support of his argument. He contends that the creditors has a prima facie right to an order and that the discretion be exercised with certain established principles.
Counsel who are in support i.e. M/S A.B. Shah, Kovada Mauch, adopt and support Mr Deverell’s submission in this respect.
I now propose to deal with Miss Githere’s application for extension of time. I am of the view that it is in the greater interest of justice indeed the interest of all the parties concerned demand that this petition be stood over to enable the Receivers to submit their Statement of Affairs. Such a course of action is, I consider, likely to assist the court to arrive at a just decision. I also note and taken account that Industrial Commercial Development Corporation is one of the parties having, considerable interest in the affairs of the East African Publishing House.
For these reasons I find this application reasonable and one with merit.
In exercise of courts discretion, I grant the adjournment and direct that the Receiver appointed be at liberty to file statement of affairs within 30 days from todays date.
The hearing of the petition of winding up is stood over till then. 70 days costs, only are awarded to the petitioner. All the other related costs are reserved till the final determination of the wining up application.
Orders accordingly.
October 21, 1987
AMIN
JUDGE