[2016] KEHC 7521 (KLR)

[2016] KEHC 7521 (KLR)

The court found that E I M is incapacitated due to a major neurological injury and is unable to manage her personal or financial affairs. The applicants, her parents, have provided continuous care and have demonstrated commitment to her welfare and that of her minor son. Medical evidence confirmed the patient's...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] KEHC 7521 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: A S M; Applicant: B L K; Patient: E I M
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application 135 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling
Outcome
application allowed in full
Legal Topics
Mental Capacity, Guardianship of Adults, Estate Management, Child Guardianship
Source Language
en
Family and Children Civil Procedure Mental Capacity Guardianship of Adults Estate Management Child Guardianship

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

A S M

Applicant

B L K

Applicant

E I M

Patient

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the applicants should be appointed legal guardians of E I M under the Mental Health Act.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants should be appointed managers of E I M's estate to manage her affairs and defray medical costs.
  3. 3 Whether the applicants should be appointed joint guardians of E I M's minor son, E M, under the Children Act.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that E I M is incapacitated due to a major neurological injury and is unable to manage her personal or financial affairs. The applicants, her parents, have provided continuous care and have demonstrated commitment to her welfare and that of her minor son. Medical evidence confirmed the patient's permanent dependency. The patient's brother consented to the applicants' appointment. The court held that, in the absence of any evidence to the contrary, the applicants are suitable to be appointed as legal guardians and managers of the patient's estate under the Mental Health Act. Furthermore, given that the minor child, E M, has been in the applicants' care since birth and knows...

Court Disposition

application allowed in full

Orders

  • A S M and B L K are appointed legal guardians of E I M under section 26 of the Mental Health Act Cap 248.
  • A S M and B L K are appointed managers of E I M’s estate under section 27 of the Mental Health Act Cap 248, with authority to access her bank accounts and pursue employment and other benefits to defray medical costs and care for the patient.