[2005] KEHC 2635 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act 2001. The applicant demonstrated financial stability, emotional maturity, and prior experience as an adoptive parent. The child, having been declared free for adoption and with the consent of her biological...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2005] KEHC 2635 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: A; Respondent: Baby EM
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Adoption Cause 184 of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Adoption Cause / Judgment
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- FI Koome
- Legal Topics
- Adoption of Children, Best Interests of Child, Parental Consent, Single Parent Adoption
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
A
Applicant
Baby EM
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Adoption Cause / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant meets the legal requirements for adoption under the Children Act 2001.
- 2 Whether the adoption is in the best interests of the child.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant satisfied all statutory requirements for adoption under the Children Act 2001. The applicant demonstrated financial stability, emotional maturity, and prior experience as an adoptive parent. The child, having been declared free for adoption and with the consent of her biological mother and grandparents, had already been integrated into the applicant's family. All professional reports recommended the adoption as being in the best interests of the child. The court concluded that the adoption would provide the child with a stable family environment, emotional support, and material care, thereby promoting her welfare and best interests. Accordingly, the...
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The applicant is authorized to adopt baby EM, who shall henceforth be known as TKN.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
Adoption Cause 184 of 2004
IN THE MATTER OF ADOPTION OF INFANTS ACT CAP 143
IN THE MATTER OF BABY EM…..............................................…….…THE INFANT
AND
A……………..…....................................……...............……………...APPLICANT
JUDGMENT
The applicant in this matter who is a single female applicant has sought for an order authorizing her to adopt the infant herein a baby girl born on the 18th April 2003.
The applicant was born on 26th February 1955, in Nairobi, she is a Kenyan citizen by birth. She is employed by the USAID Kenya as a Development Programme Officer. She has previously adopted another child on 20th June 1999.
The suitability of the applicant as the adoptive parent herein was undertaken and the following reports have been filed.
a) The Director of Children’s Services
b) The child welfare society
c) Susan Achieng the appointed guardian ad lietem
According to the reports, the child herein was offered for adoption by her biological mother because she was allegedly born out of an incestuous relationship between her mother and her first cousin and she was considered a taboo baby. The child was handed over to the District Children’s Office, Vihiga District and was subsequently placed at the New Life Home Trust at Kisumu for care and protection. The biological mother who was then aged 17 years and her parents duly gave their consent to the child being handed over for adoption purposes.
The applicant who was desirous of adopting a second child, was given this child on 4th October 2003 and she has remained under her continuous care and control. The child seems to have been integrated into the family of the applicant who enjoy tremendous support from her family. The child has also gained acceptability by the applicants first child who relate with her as a sister and so is the applicant’s mother and brothers. According to the reports filed herein the child has bonded very well with the applicant, all her material and emotional needs are taken care of and all the reports recommend the adoption as it will promote the best interest of the child. The applicant has the financial ability to provide for the child and she occupies a comfortable house where she lives with the two children. She has experience as a mother having been previously accessed and found suitable to adopt the first child. The first child is reported to be well adjusted and the source of motivation for the applicant and the reason why she sought to have a second child, to complete her life and further an opportunity to share her life, space and resource with another child in need of care and protection.
I have given considerable thought to all the material that was placed before me and I am satisfied that the applicant meets, the legal adoption requirements for local Adoption as provided for under the Children Act 2001.
The child in this matter who was declared free for adoption is also available, she was unfortunately rejected by her mother and happily she has found acceptability by the applicant and by her family. I am satisfied that this order shall promote her best interest as she stands to gain a parent and a elder brother within a family and community.
Accordingly I hereby allow the application and the applicant herein is authorized to adopt baby EM who shall henceforth be known as TKN.
It is so ordered.
Judgment read and signed on 10th June 2005.
MARTHA KOOME
JUDGE