[2018] KEHC 9756 (KLR)
The court found that there was sufficient evidence, including medical analysis and affidavit testimony, to establish that E O W is in urgent need of care due to her mental condition and lack of support in France. However, because adverse orders were sought against the 'adopted children' without service of pleadings,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2018] KEHC 9756 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: N C; Respondent: E O W (alias E W, E O W – G)
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application 128 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Interim Orders Ruling
- Outcome
- interim_guardianship_orders_granted_pending_full_hearing
- Judges
- A Ali-Aroni
- Legal Topics
- Guardianship of Persons of Unsound Mind, Interim Guardianship Orders, Management of Estate, Service of Pleadings
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
N C
Applicant
E O W (alias E W, E O W – G)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Interim Orders Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether E O W should be declared a person of unsound mind under Kenyan law.
- 2 Whether N C should be appointed as guardian ad litem and manager of E O W's estate.
- 3 Whether interim guardianship orders should be granted pending full hearing.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that there was sufficient evidence, including medical analysis and affidavit testimony, to establish that E O W is in urgent need of care due to her mental condition and lack of support in France. However, because adverse orders were sought against the 'adopted children' without service of pleadings, the court declined to make final determinations affecting their interests. Instead, the court appointed interim legal guardians (G W C, R G, and N C) to facilitate E O W's return to Kenya and manage her immediate welfare, pending full hearing. The court emphasized the necessity of serving all interested parties before making substantive orders regarding the estate or...
Court Disposition
interim_guardianship_orders_granted_pending_full_hearing
Orders
- G W C, R G, and N C are appointed as interim legal guardians of E O W (alias E W, E O W G) until the matter is fully heard and determined.
- The interim legal guardians are authorized to facilitate and/or make arrangements for E O W's travel to Kenya.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
35 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
MILIMANI FAMILY DIVISION
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 128 OF 2018
IN THE MATTER OF E O W............(A PERSON OF UNSOUND MIND)
AND
IN THE MATTER OF N C.......................................................APPLICANT
RULING
1. Before Court is an application dated 13th September 2018 filed under Certificate of urgency by one N C of California, U.S.A. The application seeks for several orders as follows;
1. …
2. That the honourable Court be pleased to make a determination that E O W (alias E W, E O W – G is a person suffering from mental disorder.
3. That the Honourable Court directs the immigration Department to reconstitute the travel documents of E O W to facilitate her return to Kenya.
4. That the Applicant herein, N C a niece of E be declared her guardianad litem.
5. That the Honourable Court be pleased to appoint N C, to manage the estate of E O W.
6. That a medical analysis be conducted both in France and Kenya to ascertain the mental status of E.
7. Proceeds from assets of E be used to cater for her maintenance and medical expenses.
8. That four children that E took care of, domiciled in Canada and elsewhere, be restrained from meddling with the assets.
9. The said E be repatriated back to Kenya to live among family who will provide care for her.
2. The application is predicated upon grounds that; the applicant discovered that the subject who resides in France has developed severe progressive dementia since about 2014 – 2015, is in need of urgent intervention by family and immediate medical attention; that though E, the subject did not have children of her own, she took care four children(‘children’) who have neglected her; she has no family in France who can provide for her and it is necessary for her to return to Kenya which the applicants seeks to do.
3. In an affidavit witnessed on 7th September 2018, the applicant states; that on 4th July, 2018 she visited the subject and found her in bad condition, she looked for the children whom the subject had looked after but they declined to assist. The applicant has since employed a care giver, and got treatment for the subject. Further the applicant deposes, the subject has misplaced her Kenyan passport and for purposes of relocating back home, the subject requires travel document.
4. The applicant further proposes that she be appointed a guardian and a manager of the subject’s assets and that proceeds from the said assets be used to maintain and take care of the subject, as the subject’s “children” are restrained from interfering with the same.
5. Several documents were annexed as a bundle marked ‘NCI’ which include photographs, email correspondences, medical analysis and a list of assets.
6. The medical analysis attached indicate that the subject is in need of both medical care and attention. And from the averment of the applicant the subject who is a residence of Paris France is on her own and not able to take care of herself.
7. Allegations were made against the subject’s ‘children’ who are said to have neglected her. The said children whose names are given as R (Vancouver), R K (Kenya), (Charissa) L and V (Mississippi), were not served with pleadings before Court. Yet the court is being asked to make adverse orders against them. R K was present in Court, notable though is that he sat quietly oblivious of the allegation against him and his ‘siblings’, it is not clear whether he had been served with the Court papers.
8. For the court to make serious orders being sought for, it is imperative that all persons of interest and those being adversely mentioned be served with the pleadings before court.
9. Notable also is that the applicant resides in California, U.S.A and it is not clear how she will provide care and attention to the subject in Kenya. However, the Court is prepared to certify the matter as urgent so as to allow the applicant to travel to Kenya due to her health condition.
10. For the reasons above the court directs and order as follows;
a. G W C, R G and N C be and are hereby appointed as interim legal guardians of the subject E O W alias E W alias E W G, until the matter is fully heard and determined.
b. That the three interim legal guardians jointly and/or severally be at liberty to facilitate and/or make arrangements for the said E O W alias E W alias E W G, to travel to Kenya.
c. The Kenyan Embassy in Paris, France with the aid of the Kenyan immigration department do facilitate the subject’s travel to Kenya.
d. The relatives, children, their servants and/or agents are all restricted and restrained from intermeddling with the Estate of the Subject until further orders of the Court.
e. The ‘adopted children’ of the subject namely R, R G, C and V, sisters and nieces of the subject be served with the pleadings herein forinter partehearing.
Dated, Delivered and Signed at Nairobi this 12th day of November 2018.
ALI-ARONI
JUDGE