[2019] KEHC 12078 (KLR)
The court found that, given the ongoing disputes among family members regarding the care and residence of the subject, and considering the subject's improved health and current living situation, it was not appropriate to make a firm order on interim custody at this stage. The court determined that maintaining the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] KEHC 12078 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: VLG; Respondent: GWC
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application 128 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Interlocutory Ruling
- Outcome
- Status quo maintained; no firm orders on interim custody granted.
- Judges
- A Ali-Aroni
- Legal Topics
- Mental Capacity, Guardianship, Interim Custody
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
VLG
Applicant
GWC
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Interlocutory Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted interim custody, care and control of EOW, a person of unsound mind.
- 2 Whether the applicant is acting in the best interests of the subject.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, given the ongoing disputes among family members regarding the care and residence of the subject, and considering the subject's improved health and current living situation, it was not appropriate to make a firm order on interim custody at this stage. The court determined that maintaining the status quo was in the best interests of the subject pending the full hearing and determination of the main petition. The court emphasized the need for all parties to file and exchange witness statements and documents to facilitate a substantive resolution based on oral evidence.
Court Disposition
Status quo maintained; no firm orders on interim custody granted.
Orders
- The current status quo regarding the subject's residence and care is to be maintained pending further hearing and determination of the petition.
- Parties who are yet to testify must file and serve witness statements and exchange documents within 21 days for hearing by oral evidence.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI
FAMILY AND PROBATE DIVISION
MISC. APPLICATION NO. 128 OF 2018
IN THE MATTER OF THE MENTAL HEALTH ACT 10 OF 1989
IN THE MATTER OF EOW (A PERSON OF UNSOUND MIND)
AND
VLG........................................................................APPLICANT
R U L I N G
1. The application subject matter of this ruling is dated 20th May 2019. The same sought for various orders and it would appear that prayers 1,2, & 3 have been take over by events.
The only substantive prayer left is prayer 3 that seeks for grant of interim custody, care and control of EOW to the Applicant VLG.
2. The application is based on grounds that the Applicant is a child of the Subject, she has now relocated to Nairobi, has obtained a job, she had renovated their Langata house and is most suited to take care of her mother.
3. The application is objected to by the sister to the Subject, GWC who states that the Applicant has failed and continues not to act in the best interest of the Subject, the Subject needs proper care, treatment and a free environment, yet the Subject now lives under a terrible condition in her Langata house, the Applicant has failed to allow the Respondent access to the Subject, further the Applicant and the Interested Party are in this matter for selfish gain.
4. The court has seen and engage the Subject severally, it appears to the court that the subject has tremendous improvement in her health over time. At the hearing of this application she appeared well groomed and spoke very well.
5. The court learnt from the Subject that she currently stays in Langata with V. The subject’s stay in Langata was not sanctioned by this court. This application therefore seeks to sanitise the applicant’s action.
6. The court was initially moved by way of a Petition dated 13th September 2018 with the Petition a Notice of Motion was filed. The same was amended on 26th October 2018 and upon hearing the amended Notice of Motion GWC, RG and NC were appointed as interim legal guardians of the Subject pending full hearing and determination of the Petition.
The court further directed that the Subjects children be served and made aware of the matter.
7. The Subject was brought to Kenya on 30th of November 2018 and since then her “family” (The interim guardians, relatives and children) have made accusations and counter accusations against each other, jossling with each other on where the Subject should stay and who should take charge and manage her affairs.
8. In the one year the subject has been in Kenya she has moved from the respondents’ house, to the interested party’s house and now to her own house where she stays with the current Applicant.
9. Against the above background, for now, I decline to make any firm orders and direct that the main petition be fixed for further hearing. For the sake of the Subject I order that the current status quo be maintained pending further hearing and determination of the petition.
10. I further direct parties who are yet to testify to file and serve witness statements and exchange documents within the next 21 days for hearing of the matter by oral evidence.
Dated and Delivered in Nairobi on this5TH day of DECEMBER, 2019
.......................
ALI-ARONI
JUDGE