[2021] KEHC 6472 (KLR)
The court found that the application for review was meritorious as it was supported by evidence of the death of a beneficiary and the discovery of a new asset. The applicable law allows for review in such circumstances. The court was satisfied that the removal of the deceased beneficiary and inclusion of the newly...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 6472 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Public Trustee; Respondent: Estate of the Late Aloise Mugo Nyaga
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyeri
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 104 of 1991
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Review of Grant
- Outcome
- application allowed; previous order reviewed
- Judges
- A Mshila
- Legal Topics
- Succession Review, Removal of Beneficiary, Inclusion of Asset, Probate and Administration, Distribution of Estate
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Public Trustee
Applicant
Estate of the Late Aloise Mugo Nyaga
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Review of Grant
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the name of a deceased beneficiary should be removed from the list of beneficiaries of the estate.
- 2 Whether a newly discovered asset should be included in the estate and distributed accordingly.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the application for review was meritorious as it was supported by evidence of the death of a beneficiary and the discovery of a new asset. The applicable law allows for review in such circumstances. The court was satisfied that the removal of the deceased beneficiary and inclusion of the newly discovered asset were justified and in accordance with the law and the supporting documentation. The orders of 30/11/1992 were therefore reviewed to exclude Teresia Wanjiku Mugo as a beneficiary and to include land parcel BARAGWE/THUMAITA/35 among the estate assets for distribution as per the agreed mode.
Court Disposition
application allowed; previous order reviewed
Orders
- The name of Teresia Wanjiku Mugo is excluded as a beneficiary to the estate of the deceased.
- Land Parcel No. BARAGWE/THUMAITA/35 is included among the deceased’s assets and shall be distributed to all persons beneficially entitled in accordance with paragraph (8) of the Supporting Affidavit dated 18/02/2021.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NYERI
SUCCESSION CAUSE NO.104 OF1991
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF THE LATE ALOISE MUGO NYAGA (DECEASED)
PUBLIC TRUSTEE.....................................PETITIONER/APPLICANT
RULING
1. The application is dated the 18/02/2021 and is premised under the provisions of Section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rules 49, 59(5) and 73 of the Probate and Administration Rules; the applicant seeks a review of the Order issued on the 30/11/1992 so as to remove the name of a deceased beneficiary and to also include a newly discovered assets to be included in the estate of the deceased and it be distributed to the beneficiaries;
2. The application is supported by the grounds on the face of the application and on the Supporting Affidavit dated 18/02/2021 made by RODAH NJUGUNA; therein she depones that she is a State Counsel in the Office of the Public Trustee and is duly authorized to make the affidavit;
3. The applicant deposes that TERESIA WANJIKUMUGO the widow of the deceased passed on the 27/02/2005 and prays that she be excluded from the list of the deceased’s beneficiaries; a copy of the Death Certificate is annexed in support of the application; she further seeks for the inclusion of a newly discovered asset known as land parcel number BARAGWE/THUMAITA/35which was not included among the deceased’s assets at the time of petitioning and confirmation of the Grant; she prays that it be included and distributed in line with the Family Agreement and the Consent to the mode of distribution dated 25/11/2020; copies of the two documents were also annexed to support the application;
4. The applicable law is found at Section 74 of the Law of Succession Act and Rule 63 of the Probate and Administration Rules – which allows a party who has discovered new and important matter(s) or evidence after the orders were made to apply for review to the court that issued the orders;
5. Upon reading the application and hearing the submissions of counsel appearing for the applicant, this court is satisfied that the prayers sought for review of the Order made on the 30/11/1992 is as envisaged under the provisions of the aforesaid provisions of the Law and is supported by a copy of the Death Certificate and a copy of the title document.
6. This court finds that this is a proper case for granting of the order for review; the application is therefore found to be meritorious and is hereby allowed.
7. The order granted on the 30/11/1992 is hereby reviewed as follows;
(i) The name of TERESIA WANJIKU MUGO be and is hereby excluded as a beneficiary to the estate of the deceased;
(ii) Land Parcel No. BARAGWE/THUMAITA/35be and is hereby included among the deceased’s assets and it be distributed to all persons beneficially entitled in accordance with paragraph (8) of the Supporting Affidavit dated 18/02/2021.
Orders Accordingly
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED ELECTRONICALLY AT NYERI THIS 7TH DAY OF JUNE, 2021.
HON. LADY JUSTICE A. MSHILA
JUDGE